The Ultimate Fight Fan
+ Log a bet
UFC Fight Night: Moicano vs. The Korean Zombie
Luis Pena
Luis Pena
6-1 · USA
VS
Matt Wiman
Matt Wiman
16-7 · USA
June 22, 2019 · Greenville, South Carolina, USA
Lightweight · 3 rounds
155.5lb
Weigh-in
155.0lb
Luis Pena def. Matt Wiman by KO/TKO (Punches), R3 1:14
Performance
Round by round
SSTDKDCtrl
R1
Pena35/650/003:09
Wiman8/141/200:10
R2
Pena29/401/104:03
Wiman9/150/100:04
R3 · 1:14
Pena23/430/000:20
Wiman7/130/000:00
Total
Pena87/1481/107:32
Wiman24/421/300:14

Pre-fight

The model's read going in

The walk-forward model's call at the time of the bout — persisted out-of-sample, with no hindsight about the result.

Prediction
PenaWin probabilityWiman
84.2%15.8%
KO / TKO
37%
Submission
30%
Decision
32%
Expected fight time: 8.5 min
What drives the pick

Each bar is a feature's push on the model from the center axis. Red pushes toward Pena, blue toward Wiman. Tap a bar for why.

Predicted outcomes
Pena84%
Wins by
Model
Equity
Mkt
KO / TKO32%38%
Submission26%32%
Decision26%30%
Predicted output
Sig. strikes39 (2251)act 87
Takedowns0.7 (0.02.5)act 1
Wiman16%
Wins by
Model
Equity
Mkt
KO / TKO6%36%
Submission4%23%
Decision6%41%
Predicted output
Sig. strikes25 (1433)act 24
Takedowns0.8 (0.02.8)act 1
Combined totals~64 sig strikes~1.5 takedownsmkt —
How it ends
mkt —
R137%
R223%
R38%
Distance32%
Fighter props
Most sig. strikestie 1.6%
Pena
67.9%-222
Wiman
+22230.5%
Most takedownstie 36.9%
Pena
27.9%+126
Wiman
-12635.2%
Significant strikes — over/under
Pena
Expected: 39.0
39
Over 39
41.6%
+136
Exactly 39
1.7%
push
Under 39
56.7%
-136
04998
Wiman
Expected: 25.5
25.5
Over 25.5
42.4%
+136
Under 25.5
57.6%
-136
03264
Takedowns — over/under
Pena
Expected: 0.7
0.5
Over 0.5
39.5%
+153
Under 0.5
60.5%
-153
035
Wiman
Expected: 0.8
1
Over 1
29.5%
+180
Exactly 1
17.3%
push
Under 1
53.2%
-180
035

Odds are model-implied (no real prop market is priced for these). The “most” prices are draw-no-bet — a tie (for takedowns, usually 0–0) is a push, so each side is priced off its chance of winning given a result, while the % shown is the raw chance of landing strictly more. Drag a line in half-point steps: a half line (e.g. 2.5) is a clean over/under, while a whole number adds a third outcome — landing exactly on it, a push — so over, exact and under sum to 100%. On a whole number the over/under odds are draw-no-bet (priced off the decisive mass, since the push refunds), so the two sides stay mirror images rather than implying an arbitrage.

Expected fight time 8.5 min. Predicted-output ranges are percentiles of the model’s simulated fights: sig strikes the middle 50% (25th–75th); takedowns the wider 10th–90th, since they’re 0 in most fights so a narrow band would collapse to 0. Win-by-method = win probability × that fighter’s own method split: the model forecasts how the fight ends, and that forecast is divided between the corners by each fighter’s finishing record — UFC wins in full, earlier-career wins at half weight, as of fight night — reconciled so the fighters’ totals still equal their win probabilities and the methods still total the fight-level forecast above. “Equity” is each of those over that fighter’s win % — how they win given that they win — so a column adds to 100%, and it differs by corner. A fighter with no classifiable wins at any level leans on the fight-level split. “How it ends” is the model’s round-of-finish split. “Mkt” is the de-vigged market prop (consensus across books), shown for context, not as a betting signal; rounds & totals slots fill as that data lands. Percentages are apportioned by largest remainder, so each set adds to its total exactly and an individual figure can sit a point off its own rounding.

Model vs market
Final
ModelMarketGapLine
To win
Pena84.2%76.7%+7.5-380
Wiman15.8%23.3%−7.5+315

Market % is the de-vigged (no-vig) consensus across the books that price both fighters; the line is the average across books with the min–max range in parentheses. Gap is the model minus the market in points (+ = the model rates that outcome above the market). Thin or one-sided markets are flagged or left blank rather than shown as a fabricated %. Shown for context, not as a bet — the closing line is the sharpest public price and the model trails it on average. For 5-round bouts the model splits its round-3+ finish mass into rounds 3–5 by the historical within-bucket rate, so the over-3.5 / 4.5 lines carry a model estimate.

Trait web
59.0Striking66.8
Wiman +7.8
35.6Grappling69.7
Wiman +34.1
Str/minStr accStr defAbsorbedTD/15TD accTD defSubs
Hover a point to see the values
PenaWiman
Tale of the tape
Ratings (Elo)
1529
Pound-for-pound
1584
1512
Divisional
1583
1505
Striking offense
1501
1500
Striking defense
1492
1507
Grappling offense
1535
1490
Grappling defense
1497
Physical
25 yrs
Age
35 yrs
6'3"
Height
5'10"
75"
Reach
68"
Southpaw
Stance
Orthodox
Striking (UFC career)
2.48
Strikes landed / min
3.51
38%
Strike accuracy
50%
2.74
Strikes absorbed / min
3.24
53%
Strike defense
55%
Grappling (UFC career)
1.34
Takedowns / 15 min
2.41
23%
Takedown accuracy
38%
46%
Takedown defense
64%
0.4
Sub attempts / 15 min
1.8
Form & résumé
67%
UFC win rate
67%
+1
Win/loss streak
+1
67%
Last-5 win rate
60%
50%
Finish rate
50%
Recent opp. quality
91
Days since last fight
1673
Recent form (last 5 UFC)
Luis Pena
  • WSteven PetersonU-DEC R3
    Close -2253mo before
  • LMichael TrizanoS-DEC R3
    Close -1657mo before
  • WRichie SmullenSUB R1
    Close -3801y before
Matt Wiman
  • WIsaac Vallie-FlaggU-DEC R3
    Close -1754y 7mo before
  • LTJ GrantKO/TKO R1
    Close +1706y 5mo before
  • WPaul SassSUB R1
    Close +1106y 9mo before
  • WMac DanzigU-DEC R3
    Close -2207y 9mo before
  • LDennis SiverU-DEC R3
    Close -1058y before
Pena — win / loss by method
Record: 6-1-0

Bar length is fight count (largest bar = full width); shading splits finishes by round and decisions by unanimous vs split — tap a bar for the round-by-round count.

KO/TKO
1 win, 0 losses
W
17% of wins
L
0% of losses
Submission
4 wins, 0 losses
W
67% of wins
L
0% of losses
Decision
1 win, 1 loss
W
17% of wins
L
100% of losses
UFC
2win1loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
0 (0%)KO/TKO(0%) 0
1 (50%)Submission(0%) 0
1 (50%)Decision(100%) 1
Non-UFC
4win0loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
1 (25%)KO/TKO() 0
3 (75%)Submission() 0
0 (0%)Decision() 0
Wiman — win / loss by method
Record: 16-7-0

Bar length is fight count (largest bar = full width); shading splits finishes by round and decisions by unanimous vs split — tap a bar for the round-by-round count.

KO/TKO
4 wins, 2 losses
W
25% of wins
L
29% of losses
Submission
5 wins, 0 losses
W
31% of wins
L
0% of losses
Decision
7 wins, 5 losses
W
44% of wins
L
71% of losses
UFC
10win5loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
2 (20%)KO/TKO(40%) 2
3 (30%)Submission(0%) 0
5 (50%)Decision(60%) 3
Non-UFC
6win2loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
2 (33%)KO/TKO(0%) 0
2 (33%)Submission(0%) 0
2 (33%)Decision(100%) 2

Profiles

Experience
Pena
Wiman
3
UFC fights
15
33.5 min · 11.2 avg
Octagon time
149.2 min · 9.9 avg
9y 10m
Career length
21y 11m
UFC schedule strength

Opponents' records on fight night — toggle their full cross-promotional record vs UFC bouts only.

Pena
Wiman
27W–7L · 79.4%
Overall
216W–64L · 77.1%
20W–7L · 74.1%
Wins
137W–44L · 75.7%
7W–0L · 100.0%
Losses
79W–20L · 79.8%
Non-UFC schedule strength
Pena
Wiman
8W–1L · 88.9%
Overall
25W–5L · 83.3%
8W–1L · 88.9%
Wins
1W–1L · 50.0%
0W–0L
Losses
24W–4L · 85.7%
Distance striking
Pena
Wiman
5.41
Landed / min
5.95
35.0%
Accuracy
39.4%
59.4%
Defense
64.3%
0.45
Knockdowns / 15 min
0.10
35.3%
Time at distance
24.8%
Grappling & control
Pena
Wiman
1.34
Takedowns / 15 min
2.41
23.1%
Takedown accuracy
38.1%
46.2%
Takedown defense
63.6%
0.45
Sub attempts / 15 min
1.81
55.4%
Control share
60.1%
Strike target map
Pena
  • Head76%(63)div 63%
  • Body22%(18)div 20%
  • Legs2%(2)div 17%
Wiman
  • Head72%(377)div 63%
  • Body12%(65)div 20%
  • Legs15%(81)div 17%

Where each fighter lands significant strikes (career). “div” = the weight-class average.

Luis Pena
CloseSSTDKDCtrl

Per-fight: SS & TD shown landed/attempted; Close = consensus closing line.

Matt Wiman
CloseSSTDKDCtrl

Per-fight: SS & TD shown landed/attempted; Close = consensus closing line.