The Ultimate Fight Fan
+ Log a bet
UFC 54: Boiling Point
Trevor Prangley
Trevor Prangley
10-2 · ZAF
VS
Travis Lutter
Travis Lutter
6-2 · USA
August 20, 2005 · Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Middleweight · 3 rounds
184.5lb
Weigh-in
186.0lb
Trevor Prangley def. Travis Lutter by U-DEC, R3 5:00
Performance
Round by round
SSTDKDCtrl
R1
Prangley31/403/303:26
Lutter4/80/300:31
R2
Prangley15/181/203:02
Lutter5/90/201:06
R3
Prangley8/121/104:23
Lutter0/20/200:03
Total
Prangley54/705/6010:51
Lutter9/190/701:40

Scorecards

Prangley vs Lutter

RdCecil PeoplesDalby ShirleyTony WeeksCommunity
R1---10-9
R2---10-9
R3---10-9
Total30-2730-2730-2630-27

Official cards + public consensus via MMA Decisions. Per round: Prangley-Lutter.

Pre-fight

The model's read going in

The walk-forward model's call at the time of the bout — persisted out-of-sample, with no hindsight about the result.

Prediction
PrangleyWin probabilityLutter
53.0%47.0%
KO / TKO
21%
Submission
37%
Decision
42%
Expected fight time: 10.3 min
What drives the pick

Each bar is a feature's push on the model from the center axis. Red pushes toward Prangley, blue toward Lutter. Tap a bar for why.

Predicted outcomes
Prangley53%
Wins by
Model
Equity
Mkt
KO / TKO11%21%
Submission18%34%
Decision24%45%
Predicted output
Sig. strikes26 (1434)act 54
Takedowns2.4 (0.05.3)act 5
Lutter47%
Wins by
Model
Equity
Mkt
KO / TKO10%21%
Submission19%40%
Decision18%39%
Predicted output
Sig. strikes20 (1127)act 9
Takedowns0.4 (0.01.7)act 0
Combined totals~46 sig strikes~2.8 takedownsmkt —
How it ends
mkt —
R117%
R232%
R39%
Distance42%
Fighter props
Most sig. strikestie 2.2%
Prangley
59.7%-157
Lutter
+15738.1%
Most takedownstie 16.4%
Prangley
73.6%-742
Lutter
+7429.9%
Significant strikes — over/under
Prangley
Expected: 26.0
26
Over 26
41.3%
+136
Exactly 26
2.5%
push
Under 26
56.2%
-136
03366
Lutter
Expected: 20.4
20.5
Over 20.5
42.2%
+137
Under 20.5
57.8%
-137
02652
Takedowns — over/under
Prangley
Expected: 2.4
2.5
Over 2.5
46.6%
+115
Under 2.5
53.4%
-115
048
Lutter
Expected: 0.4
0.5
Over 0.5
29.2%
+242
Under 0.5
70.8%
-242
035

Odds are model-implied (no real prop market is priced for these). The “most” prices are draw-no-bet — a tie (for takedowns, usually 0–0) is a push, so each side is priced off its chance of winning given a result, while the % shown is the raw chance of landing strictly more. Drag a line in half-point steps: a half line (e.g. 2.5) is a clean over/under, while a whole number adds a third outcome — landing exactly on it, a push — so over, exact and under sum to 100%. On a whole number the over/under odds are draw-no-bet (priced off the decisive mass, since the push refunds), so the two sides stay mirror images rather than implying an arbitrage.

Expected fight time 10.3 min. Predicted-output ranges are percentiles of the model’s simulated fights: sig strikes the middle 50% (25th–75th); takedowns the wider 10th–90th, since they’re 0 in most fights so a narrow band would collapse to 0. Win-by-method = win probability × that fighter’s own method split: the model forecasts how the fight ends, and that forecast is divided between the corners by each fighter’s finishing record — UFC wins in full, earlier-career wins at half weight, as of fight night — reconciled so the fighters’ totals still equal their win probabilities and the methods still total the fight-level forecast above. “Equity” is each of those over that fighter’s win % — how they win given that they win — so a column adds to 100%, and it differs by corner. A fighter with no classifiable wins at any level leans on the fight-level split. “How it ends” is the model’s round-of-finish split. “Mkt” is the de-vigged market prop (consensus across books), shown for context, not as a betting signal; rounds & totals slots fill as that data lands. Percentages are apportioned by largest remainder, so each set adds to its total exactly and an individual figure can sit a point off its own rounding.

Model vs market
Final
ModelMarketGapLine
To win
Prangley53.0%52.0%+1.0-125
Lutter47.0%48.0%−1.0-105

Market % is the de-vigged (no-vig) consensus across the books that price both fighters; the line is the average across books with the min–max range in parentheses. Gap is the model minus the market in points (+ = the model rates that outcome above the market). Thin or one-sided markets are flagged or left blank rather than shown as a fabricated %. Shown for context, not as a bet — the closing line is the sharpest public price and the model trails it on average. For 5-round bouts the model splits its round-3+ finish mass into rounds 3–5 by the historical within-bucket rate, so the over-3.5 / 4.5 lines carry a model estimate.

Trait web
65.2Striking46.7
Prangley +18.5
72.4Grappling42.1
Prangley +30.3
Str/minStr accStr defAbsorbedTD/15TD accTD defSubs
Hover a point to see the values
PrangleyLutter
Tale of the tape
Ratings (Elo)
1534
Pound-for-pound
1508
1534
Divisional
1493
1473
Striking offense
1494
1499
Striking defense
1505
1559
Grappling offense
1547
1554
Grappling defense
1536
Physical
32 yrs
Age
32 yrs
6'1"
Height
5'11"
75"
Reach
75"
Orthodox
Stance
Orthodox
Striking (UFC career)
1.97
Strikes landed / min
0.07
67%
Strike accuracy
7%
0.82
Strikes absorbed / min
1.53
29%
Strike defense
70%
Grappling (UFC career)
4.93
Takedowns / 15 min
1.09
50%
Takedown accuracy
50%
Takedown defense
50%
4.9
Sub attempts / 15 min
0.0
Form & résumé
100%
UFC win rate
50%
+1
Win/loss streak
-1
100%
Last-5 win rate
50%
100%
Finish rate
100%
Recent opp. quality
427
Days since last fight
126
Recent form (last 5 UFC)
Trevor Prangley
  • WCurtis StoutSUB R2
    Close -2751y 2mo before
Travis Lutter
  • LMatt LindlandSUB R2
    Close +1554mo before
  • WMarvin EastmanKO/TKO R2
    10mo before
Prangley — win / loss by method
Record: 10-2-0

Bar length is fight count (largest bar = full width); shading splits finishes by round and decisions by unanimous vs split — tap a bar for the round-by-round count.

KO/TKO
3 wins, 0 losses
W
30% of wins
L
0% of losses
Submission
3 wins, 1 loss
W
30% of wins
L
50% of losses
Decision
4 wins, 1 loss
W
40% of wins
L
50% of losses
UFC
1win0loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
0 (0%)KO/TKO() 0
1 (100%)Submission() 0
0 (0%)Decision() 0
Non-UFC
9win2loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
3 (33%)KO/TKO(0%) 0
2 (22%)Submission(50%) 1
4 (44%)Decision(50%) 1
Lutter — win / loss by method
Record: 6-2-0

Bar length is fight count (largest bar = full width); shading splits finishes by round and decisions by unanimous vs split — tap a bar for the round-by-round count.

KO/TKO
1 win, 1 loss
W
17% of wins
L
50% of losses
Submission
4 wins, 1 loss
W
67% of wins
L
50% of losses
Decision
1 win, 0 losses
W
17% of wins
L
0% of losses
UFC
1win1loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
1 (100%)KO/TKO(0%) 0
0 (0%)Submission(100%) 1
0 (0%)Decision(0%) 0
Non-UFC
5win1loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
0 (0%)KO/TKO(100%) 1
4 (80%)Submission(0%) 0
1 (20%)Decision(0%) 0

Profiles

Experience
Prangley
Lutter
1
UFC fights
2
6.1 min · 6.1 avg
Octagon time
13.8 min · 6.9 avg
25y 6m
Career length
27y 9m
UFC schedule strength

Opponents' records on fight night — toggle their full cross-promotional record vs UFC bouts only.

Prangley
Lutter
7W–3L · 70.0%
Overall
19W–6L · 76.0%
7W–3L · 70.0%
Wins
6W–3L · 66.7%
0W–0L
Losses
13W–3L · 81.3%
Non-UFC schedule strength
Prangley
Lutter
70W–26L · 72.9%
Overall
32W–15L · 68.1%
49W–20L · 71.0%
Wins
29W–14L · 67.4%
21W–6L · 77.8%
Losses
3W–1L · 75.0%
Distance striking
Prangley
Lutter
0.00
Landed / min
0.18
0.0%
Accuracy
6.7%
20.0%
Defense
80.4%
0.00
Knockdowns / 15 min
1.09
14.2%
Time at distance
40.3%
Grappling & control
Prangley
Lutter
4.93
Takedowns / 15 min
1.09
50.0%
Takedown accuracy
50.0%
Takedown defense
50.0%
4.93
Sub attempts / 15 min
0.00
99.0%
Control share
26.0%
Strike target map
Prangley
  • Head17%(2)div 65%
  • Body83%(10)div 19%
  • Legs0%(0)div 16%
Lutter
  • Head100%(1)div 65%
  • Body0%(0)div 19%
  • Legs0%(0)div 16%

Where each fighter lands significant strikes (career). “div” = the weight-class average.

Trevor Prangley
CloseSSTDKDCtrl

Per-fight: SS & TD shown landed/attempted; Close = consensus closing line.

Travis Lutter
CloseSSTDKDCtrl

Per-fight: SS & TD shown landed/attempted; Close = consensus closing line.