The Ultimate Fight Fan
+ Log a bet
The Ultimate Fighter: Team GSP vs Team Koscheck Finale
Ian Loveland
Ian Loveland
13-7 · USA
VS
Tyler Toner
Tyler Toner
11-2 · USA
December 4, 2010 · Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Featherweight · 3 rounds
Ian Loveland def. Tyler Toner by U-DEC, R3 5:00
Performance
Round by round
SSTDKDCtrl
R1
Loveland10/230/014:50
Toner1/10/000:00
R2
Loveland14/340/011:33
Toner9/220/000:00
R3
Loveland20/550/000:00
Toner11/550/000:00
Total
Loveland44/1120/026:23
Toner21/780/000:00

Scorecards

Loveland vs Toner

RdGlenn TrowbridgeJunichiro KamijoTony WeeksCommunity
R110-9--10-9
R210-9--10-9
R310-9--9.7-9.3
Total30-2729-2830-2629.7-27.3

Media (4 cards) · avg 29.327.5 · 4 Loveland · 0 Toner

Official cards + public consensus via MMA Decisions. Per round: Loveland-Toner.

Pre-fight

The model's read going in

The walk-forward model's call at the time of the bout — persisted out-of-sample, with no hindsight about the result.

Prediction
LovelandWin probabilityToner
48.1%51.9%
KO / TKO
25%
Submission
13%
Decision
61%
Expected fight time: 11.4 min
What drives the pick

Each bar is a feature's push on the model from the center axis. Red pushes toward Loveland, blue toward Toner. Tap a bar for why.

Predicted outcomes
Loveland48%
Wins by
Model
Equity
Mkt
KO / TKO12%25%
Submission8%17%
Decision28%58%
Predicted output
Sig. strikes54 (3070)act 44
Takedowns0.4 (0.01.6)act 0
Toner52%
Wins by
Model
Equity
Mkt
KO / TKO13%25%
Submission6%11%
Decision33%64%
Predicted output
Sig. strikes53 (3070)act 21
Takedowns1.2 (0.03.0)act 0
Combined totals~107 sig strikes~1.6 takedownsmkt —
How it ends
mkt —
R120%
R213%
R36%
Distance61%
Fighter props
Most sig. strikestie 1.0%
Loveland
49.9%-102
Toner
+10249.1%
Most takedownstie 19.6%
Loveland
12.9%+524
Toner
-52467.5%
Significant strikes — over/under
Loveland
Expected: 53.9
54
Over 54
41.7%
+137
Exactly 54
1.2%
push
Under 54
57.0%
-137
068135
Toner
Expected: 53.4
53.5
Over 53.5
42.4%
+136
Under 53.5
57.6%
-136
067134
Takedowns — over/under
Loveland
Expected: 0.4
0.5
Over 0.5
37.6%
+166
Under 0.5
62.4%
-166
035
Toner
Expected: 1.2
1
Over 1
48.2%
-371
Exactly 1
38.8%
push
Under 1
13.0%
+371
035

Odds are model-implied (no real prop market is priced for these). The “most” prices are draw-no-bet — a tie (for takedowns, usually 0–0) is a push, so each side is priced off its chance of winning given a result, while the % shown is the raw chance of landing strictly more. Drag a line in half-point steps: a half line (e.g. 2.5) is a clean over/under, while a whole number adds a third outcome — landing exactly on it, a push — so over, exact and under sum to 100%. On a whole number the over/under odds are draw-no-bet (priced off the decisive mass, since the push refunds), so the two sides stay mirror images rather than implying an arbitrage.

Expected fight time 11.4 min. Predicted-output ranges are percentiles of the model’s simulated fights: sig strikes the middle 50% (25th–75th); takedowns the wider 10th–90th, since they’re 0 in most fights so a narrow band would collapse to 0. Win-by-method = win probability × that fighter’s own method split: the model forecasts how the fight ends, and that forecast is divided between the corners by each fighter’s finishing record — UFC wins in full, earlier-career wins at half weight, as of fight night — reconciled so the fighters’ totals still equal their win probabilities and the methods still total the fight-level forecast above. “Equity” is each of those over that fighter’s win % — how they win given that they win — so a column adds to 100%, and it differs by corner. A fighter with no classifiable wins at any level leans on the fight-level split. “How it ends” is the model’s round-of-finish split. “Mkt” is the de-vigged market prop (consensus across books), shown for context, not as a betting signal; rounds & totals slots fill as that data lands. Percentages are apportioned by largest remainder, so each set adds to its total exactly and an individual figure can sit a point off its own rounding.

Model vs market
Final
ModelMarketGapLine
To win
Loveland48.1%28.9%+19.2+235
Toner51.9%71.1%−19.2-275

Market % is the de-vigged (no-vig) consensus across the books that price both fighters; the line is the average across books with the min–max range in parentheses. Gap is the model minus the market in points (+ = the model rates that outcome above the market). Thin or one-sided markets are flagged or left blank rather than shown as a fabricated %. Shown for context, not as a bet — the closing line is the sharpest public price and the model trails it on average. For 5-round bouts the model splits its round-3+ finish mass into rounds 3–5 by the historical within-bucket rate, so the over-3.5 / 4.5 lines carry a model estimate.

Tale of the tape
Ratings (Elo)
1502
Pound-for-pound
1528
1502
Divisional
1528
1500
Striking offense
1500
1500
Striking defense
1500
1500
Grappling offense
1500
1500
Grappling defense
1500
Physical
27 yrs
Age
27 yrs
5'8"
Height
5'8"
Reach
70"
Orthodox
Stance
Orthodox
Striking (UFC career)
Strikes landed / min
Strike accuracy
Strikes absorbed / min
Strike defense
Grappling (UFC career)
Takedowns / 15 min
Takedown accuracy
Takedown defense
Sub attempts / 15 min
Form & résumé
UFC win rate
Win/loss streak
Last-5 win rate
Finish rate
Recent opp. quality
Days since last fight
Recent form (last 5 UFC)
Ian Loveland
No prior UFC fights.
Tyler Toner
No prior UFC fights.
Loveland — win / loss by method
Record: 13-7-0

Bar length is fight count (largest bar = full width); shading splits finishes by round and decisions by unanimous vs split — tap a bar for the round-by-round count.

KO/TKO
6 wins, 1 loss
W
46% of wins
L
14% of losses
Submission
6 wins, 6 losses
W
46% of wins
L
86% of losses
Decision
1 win, 0 losses
W
8% of wins
L
0% of losses
UFC
0win0loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
0 ()KO/TKO() 0
0 ()Submission() 0
0 ()Decision() 0
Non-UFC
13win7loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
6 (46%)KO/TKO(14%) 1
6 (46%)Submission(86%) 6
1 (8%)Decision(0%) 0
Toner — win / loss by method
Record: 11-2-0, 1 NC

Bar length is fight count (largest bar = full width); shading splits finishes by round and decisions by unanimous vs split — tap a bar for the round-by-round count.

KO/TKO
6 wins, 0 losses
W
55% of wins
L
0% of losses
Submission
3 wins, 0 losses
W
27% of wins
L
0% of losses
Decision
2 wins, 2 losses
W
18% of wins
L
100% of losses
UFC
0win0loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
0 ()KO/TKO() 0
0 ()Submission() 0
0 ()Decision() 0
Non-UFC
11win2loss0draw1NC
WinsLosses
6 (55%)KO/TKO(0%) 0
3 (27%)Submission(0%) 0
2 (18%)Decision(100%) 2

Profiles

Experience
Loveland
Toner
0
UFC fights
0
Octagon time
Career length
UFC schedule strength

Opponents' records on fight night — toggle their full cross-promotional record vs UFC bouts only.

Loveland
Toner
Overall
Wins
Losses
Non-UFC schedule strength
Loveland
Toner
93W–49L · 65.5%
Overall
50W–11L · 82.0%
63W–33L · 65.6%
Wins
34W–9L · 79.1%
30W–16L · 65.2%
Losses
16W–2L · 88.9%
Distance striking
Loveland
Toner
Landed / min
Accuracy
Defense
Knockdowns / 15 min
Time at distance
Grappling & control
Loveland
Toner
Takedowns / 15 min
Takedown accuracy
Takedown defense
Sub attempts / 15 min
Control share
Strike target map
Loveland
  • Head0%(0)
  • Body0%(0)
  • Legs0%(0)
  • No strike data on record.
Toner
  • Head0%(0)
  • Body0%(0)
  • Legs0%(0)
  • No strike data on record.

Where each fighter lands significant strikes (career). “div” = the weight-class average.

Ian Loveland

No UFC fights on record.

Per-fight: SS & TD shown landed/attempted; Close = consensus closing line.

Tyler Toner

No UFC fights on record.

Per-fight: SS & TD shown landed/attempted; Close = consensus closing line.