The Ultimate Fight Fan
+ Log a bet
UFC on FOX: Velasquez vs Dos Santos
VS
Clay Harvison
Clay Harvison
9-3 · USA
November 12, 2011 · Anaheim, California, USA
Welterweight · 3 rounds
171.0lb
Weigh-in
169.0lb
DaMarques Johnson def. Clay Harvison by KO/TKO (Punch), R1 1:34
Performance
Round by round
SSTDKDCtrl
R1 · 1:34
Johnson6/200/010:02
Harvison6/210/000:00
Total
Johnson6/200/010:02
Harvison6/210/000:00

Pre-fight

The model's read going in

The walk-forward model's call at the time of the bout — persisted out-of-sample, with no hindsight about the result.

Prediction
JohnsonWin probabilityHarvison
63.7%36.3%
KO / TKO
32%
Submission
25%
Decision
44%
Expected fight time: 9.3 min
What drives the pick

Each bar is a feature's push on the model from the center axis. Red pushes toward Johnson, blue toward Harvison. Tap a bar for why.

Predicted outcomes
Johnson64%
Wins by
Model
Equity
Mkt
KO / TKO21%32%
Submission17%27%
Decision26%41%
Predicted output
Sig. strikes29 (1638)act 6
Takedowns0.7 (0.02.5)act 0
Harvison36%
Wins by
Model
Equity
Mkt
KO / TKO11%30%
Submission7%21%
Decision18%49%
Predicted output
Sig. strikes35 (2046)act 6
Takedowns0.8 (0.02.7)act 0
Combined totals~65 sig strikes~1.4 takedownsmkt —
How it ends
mkt —
R136%
R215%
R35%
Distance44%
Fighter props
Most sig. strikestie 1.7%
Johnson
40.3%+144
Harvison
-14458.1%
Most takedownstie 40.9%
Johnson
27.0%+119
Harvison
-11932.1%
Significant strikes — over/under
Johnson
Expected: 29.2
29
Over 29
41.7%
+134
Exactly 29
2.3%
push
Under 29
56.0%
-134
03773
Harvison
Expected: 35.5
35.5
Over 35.5
42.4%
+136
Under 35.5
57.6%
-136
04589
Takedowns — over/under
Johnson
Expected: 0.7
0.5
Over 0.5
36.6%
+174
Under 0.5
63.4%
-174
035
Harvison
Expected: 0.8
1
Over 1
27.0%
+217
Exactly 1
14.4%
push
Under 1
58.6%
-217
035

Odds are model-implied (no real prop market is priced for these). The “most” prices are draw-no-bet — a tie (for takedowns, usually 0–0) is a push, so each side is priced off its chance of winning given a result, while the % shown is the raw chance of landing strictly more. Drag a line in half-point steps: a half line (e.g. 2.5) is a clean over/under, while a whole number adds a third outcome — landing exactly on it, a push — so over, exact and under sum to 100%. On a whole number the over/under odds are draw-no-bet (priced off the decisive mass, since the push refunds), so the two sides stay mirror images rather than implying an arbitrage.

Expected fight time 9.3 min. Predicted-output ranges are percentiles of the model’s simulated fights: sig strikes the middle 50% (25th–75th); takedowns the wider 10th–90th, since they’re 0 in most fights so a narrow band would collapse to 0. Win-by-method = win probability × that fighter’s own method split: the model forecasts how the fight ends, and that forecast is divided between the corners by each fighter’s finishing record — UFC wins in full, earlier-career wins at half weight, as of fight night — reconciled so the fighters’ totals still equal their win probabilities and the methods still total the fight-level forecast above. “Equity” is each of those over that fighter’s win % — how they win given that they win — so a column adds to 100%, and it differs by corner. A fighter with no classifiable wins at any level leans on the fight-level split. “How it ends” is the model’s round-of-finish split. “Mkt” is the de-vigged market prop (consensus across books), shown for context, not as a betting signal; rounds & totals slots fill as that data lands. Percentages are apportioned by largest remainder, so each set adds to its total exactly and an individual figure can sit a point off its own rounding.

Model vs market
Final
ModelMarketGapLine
To win
Johnson63.7%71.1%−7.4-260
Harvison36.3%28.9%+7.4+240

Market % is the de-vigged (no-vig) consensus across the books that price both fighters; the line is the average across books with the min–max range in parentheses. Gap is the model minus the market in points (+ = the model rates that outcome above the market). Thin or one-sided markets are flagged or left blank rather than shown as a fabricated %. Shown for context, not as a bet — the closing line is the sharpest public price and the model trails it on average. For 5-round bouts the model splits its round-3+ finish mass into rounds 3–5 by the historical within-bucket rate, so the over-3.5 / 4.5 lines carry a model estimate.

Trait web
49.7Striking64.8
Harvison +15.1
40.6Grappling65.2
Harvison +24.6
Str/minStr accStr defAbsorbedTD/15TD accTD defSubs
Hover a point to see the values
JohnsonHarvison
Tale of the tape
Ratings (Elo)
1506
Pound-for-pound
1512
1505
Divisional
1513
1499
Striking offense
1497
1487
Striking defense
1497
Grappling offense
Grappling defense
Physical
29 yrs
Age
31 yrs
6'1"
Height
6'1"
75"
Reach
74"
Orthodox
Stance
Orthodox
Striking (UFC career)
2.24
Strikes landed / min
3.25
38%
Strike accuracy
51%
4.67
Strikes absorbed / min
3.92
52%
Strike defense
58%
Grappling (UFC career)
1.06
Takedowns / 15 min
0.71
43%
Takedown accuracy
100%
25%
Takedown defense
68%
0.7
Sub attempts / 15 min
1.4
Form & résumé
50%
UFC win rate
50%
-1
Win/loss streak
-1
60%
Last-5 win rate
50%
100%
Finish rate
0%
Recent opp. quality
231
Days since last fight
56
Recent form (last 5 UFC)
DaMarques Johnson
  • LAmir SadollahKO/TKO R2
    Close +2208mo before
  • WMike GuymonSUB R1
    Close -12510mo before
  • LMatthew RiddleKO/TKO R2
    missedClose +1801y 3mo before
  • WBrad BlackburnKO/TKO R3
    Close +1401y 7mo before
  • WEdgar GarciaSUB R1
    Close +2001y 11mo before
Clay Harvison
  • LSeth BaczynskiSUB R2
    Close +14056d before
  • WJustin EdwardsS-DEC R3
    Close +1705mo before
Johnson — win / loss by method
Record: 14-9-0

Bar length is fight count (largest bar = full width); shading splits finishes by round and decisions by unanimous vs split — tap a bar for the round-by-round count.

KO/TKO
7 wins, 4 losses
W
50% of wins
L
44% of losses
Submission
5 wins, 4 losses
W
36% of wins
L
44% of losses
Decision
2 wins, 1 loss
W
14% of wins
L
11% of losses
UFC
3win3loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
1 (33%)KO/TKO(67%) 2
2 (67%)Submission(33%) 1
0 (0%)Decision(0%) 0
Non-UFC
11win6loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
6 (55%)KO/TKO(33%) 2
3 (27%)Submission(50%) 3
2 (18%)Decision(17%) 1
Harvison — win / loss by method
Record: 9-3-0

Bar length is fight count (largest bar = full width); shading splits finishes by round and decisions by unanimous vs split — tap a bar for the round-by-round count.

KO/TKO
5 wins, 1 loss
W
56% of wins
L
33% of losses
Submission
3 wins, 2 losses
W
33% of wins
L
67% of losses
Decision
1 win, 0 losses
W
11% of wins
L
0% of losses
UFC
1win1loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
0 (0%)KO/TKO(0%) 0
0 (0%)Submission(100%) 1
1 (100%)Decision(0%) 0
Non-UFC
8win2loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
5 (63%)KO/TKO(50%) 1
3 (38%)Submission(50%) 1
0 (0%)Decision(0%) 0

Profiles

Experience
Johnson
Harvison
6
UFC fights
2
42.4 min · 7.1 avg
Octagon time
21.2 min · 10.6 avg
21y 3m
Career length
19y 6m
UFC schedule strength

Opponents' records on fight night — toggle their full cross-promotional record vs UFC bouts only.

Johnson
Harvison
50W–20L · 71.4%
Overall
19W–6L · 76.0%
37W–15L · 71.2%
Wins
6W–0L · 100.0%
13W–5L · 72.2%
Losses
13W–6L · 68.4%
Non-UFC schedule strength
Johnson
Harvison
132W–73L · 64.4%
Overall
13W–9L · 59.1%
75W–60L · 55.6%
Wins
11W–9L · 55.0%
57W–13L · 81.4%
Losses
2W–0L · 100.0%
Distance striking
Johnson
Harvison
4.15
Landed / min
5.31
30.5%
Accuracy
35.2%
58.0%
Defense
69.6%
0.35
Knockdowns / 15 min
0.00
34.7%
Time at distance
28.4%
Grappling & control
Johnson
Harvison
1.06
Takedowns / 15 min
0.71
42.9%
Takedown accuracy
100.0%
25.0%
Takedown defense
68.2%
0.71
Sub attempts / 15 min
1.42
33.0%
Control share
28.8%
Strike target map
Johnson
  • Head82%(78)div 63%
  • Body13%(12)div 22%
  • Legs5%(5)div 16%
Harvison
  • Head52%(36)div 63%
  • Body39%(27)div 22%
  • Legs9%(6)div 16%

Where each fighter lands significant strikes (career). “div” = the weight-class average.

DaMarques Johnson
CloseSSTDKDCtrl

Per-fight: SS & TD shown landed/attempted; Close = consensus closing line.

Clay Harvison
CloseSSTDKDCtrl

Per-fight: SS & TD shown landed/attempted; Close = consensus closing line.