The Ultimate Fight Fan
+ Log a bet
UFC 141: Lesnar vs Overeem
Jimy Hettes
Jimy Hettes
9-0 · USA
VS
Nam Phan
Nam Phan
17-9 · USA
December 30, 2011 · Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Featherweight · 3 rounds
Jimy Hettes def. Nam Phan by U-DEC, R3 5:00
Performance
Round by round
SSTDKDCtrl
R1
Hettes48/624/504:29
Phan2/20/000:00
R2
Hettes11/164/903:43
Phan5/130/000:35
R3
Hettes22/373/603:40
Phan9/270/000:00
Total
Hettes81/11511/20011:52
Phan16/420/000:35

Scorecards

Hettes vs Phan

RdJunichiro KamijoMark SmithSal D'AmatoCommunity
R110-810-810-810-8.2
R210-910-910-910-9
R310-810-910-810-8.4
Total30-2530-2630-2530-25.6

Media (6 cards) · avg 3026 · 6 Hettes · 0 Phan

Official cards + public consensus via MMA Decisions. Per round: Hettes-Phan.

Pre-fight

The model's read going in

The walk-forward model's call at the time of the bout — persisted out-of-sample, with no hindsight about the result.

Prediction
HettesWin probabilityPhan
76.3%23.7%
KO / TKO
40%
Submission
12%
Decision
47%
Expected fight time: 9.9 min
What drives the pick

Each bar is a feature's push on the model from the center axis. Red pushes toward Hettes, blue toward Phan. Tap a bar for why.

Predicted outcomes
Hettes76%
Wins by
Model
Equity
Mkt
KO / TKO29%39%
Submission11%14%
Decision36%47%
Predicted output
Sig. strikes44 (2558)act 81
Takedowns2.2 (0.05.1)act 11
Phan24%
Wins by
Model
Equity
Mkt
KO / TKO11%46%
Submission1%5%
Decision12%49%
Predicted output
Sig. strikes38 (2149)act 16
Takedowns0.1 (0.00.2)act 0
Combined totals~82 sig strikes~2.3 takedownsmkt —
How it ends
mkt —
R129%
R217%
R37%
Distance47%
Fighter props
Most sig. strikestie 1.3%
Hettes
56.9%-136
Phan
+13641.8%
Most takedownstie 22.4%
Hettes
73.6%-1833
Phan
+18334.0%
Significant strikes — over/under
Hettes
Expected: 44.2
44
Over 44
42.1%
+134
Exactly 44
1.5%
push
Under 44
56.4%
-134
056111
Phan
Expected: 37.5
37.5
Over 37.5
42.6%
+135
Under 37.5
57.4%
-135
04794
Takedowns — over/under
Hettes
Expected: 2.2
2
Over 2
42.4%
-106
Exactly 2
17.5%
push
Under 2
40.1%
+106
047
Phan
Expected: 0.1
0
Over 0
11.2%
Exactly 0
88.8%
push
Under 0
0.0%
035

Odds are model-implied (no real prop market is priced for these). The “most” prices are draw-no-bet — a tie (for takedowns, usually 0–0) is a push, so each side is priced off its chance of winning given a result, while the % shown is the raw chance of landing strictly more. Drag a line in half-point steps: a half line (e.g. 2.5) is a clean over/under, while a whole number adds a third outcome — landing exactly on it, a push — so over, exact and under sum to 100%. On a whole number the over/under odds are draw-no-bet (priced off the decisive mass, since the push refunds), so the two sides stay mirror images rather than implying an arbitrage.

Expected fight time 9.9 min. Predicted-output ranges are percentiles of the model’s simulated fights: sig strikes the middle 50% (25th–75th); takedowns the wider 10th–90th, since they’re 0 in most fights so a narrow band would collapse to 0. Win-by-method = win probability × that fighter’s own method split: the model forecasts how the fight ends, and that forecast is divided between the corners by each fighter’s finishing record — UFC wins in full, earlier-career wins at half weight, as of fight night — reconciled so the fighters’ totals still equal their win probabilities and the methods still total the fight-level forecast above. “Equity” is each of those over that fighter’s win % — how they win given that they win — so a column adds to 100%, and it differs by corner. A fighter with no classifiable wins at any level leans on the fight-level split. “How it ends” is the model’s round-of-finish split. “Mkt” is the de-vigged market prop (consensus across books), shown for context, not as a betting signal; rounds & totals slots fill as that data lands. Percentages are apportioned by largest remainder, so each set adds to its total exactly and an individual figure can sit a point off its own rounding.

Model vs market
Final
ModelMarketGapLine
To win
Hettes76.3%38.6%+37.7+155
Phan23.7%61.4%−37.7-165

Market % is the de-vigged (no-vig) consensus across the books that price both fighters; the line is the average across books with the min–max range in parentheses. Gap is the model minus the market in points (+ = the model rates that outcome above the market). Thin or one-sided markets are flagged or left blank rather than shown as a fabricated %. Shown for context, not as a bet — the closing line is the sharpest public price and the model trails it on average. For 5-round bouts the model splits its round-3+ finish mass into rounds 3–5 by the historical within-bucket rate, so the over-3.5 / 4.5 lines carry a model estimate.

Trait web
49.7Striking73.3
Phan +23.6
75.0Grappling50.2
Hettes +24.8
Str/minStr accStr defAbsorbedTD/15TD accTD defSubs
Hover a point to see the values
HettesPhan
Tale of the tape
Ratings (Elo)
1541
Pound-for-pound
1499
1541
Divisional
1501
1473
Striking offense
1509
1505
Striking defense
1498
1507
Grappling offense
1491
1498
Grappling defense
1510
Physical
24 yrs
Age
28 yrs
5'9"
Height
5'6"
71"
Reach
70"
Southpaw
Stance
Orthodox
Striking (UFC career)
0.24
Strikes landed / min
6.98
29%
Strike accuracy
46%
1.59
Strikes absorbed / min
4.98
48%
Strike defense
71%
Grappling (UFC career)
9.15
Takedowns / 15 min
0.33
56%
Takedown accuracy
100%
Takedown defense
70%
3.7
Sub attempts / 15 min
0.3
Form & résumé
100%
UFC win rate
33%
+1
Win/loss streak
+1
100%
Last-5 win rate
33%
100%
Finish rate
0%
Recent opp. quality
138
Days since last fight
83
Recent form (last 5 UFC)
Jimy Hettes
  • WAlex CaceresSUB R2
    Close -4205mo before
Nam Phan
  • WLeonard GarciaU-DEC R3
    Close -2353mo before
  • LMike BrownU-DEC R3
    Close +1905mo before
  • LLeonard GarciaS-DEC R3
    Close +1651y 1mo before
Hettes — win / loss by method
Record: 9-0-0

Bar length is fight count (largest bar = full width); shading splits finishes by round and decisions by unanimous vs split — tap a bar for the round-by-round count.

KO/TKO
0 wins, 0 losses
W
0% of wins
L
Submission
9 wins, 0 losses
W
100% of wins
L
Decision
0 wins, 0 losses
W
0% of wins
L
UFC
1win0loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
0 (0%)KO/TKO() 0
1 (100%)Submission() 0
0 (0%)Decision() 0
Non-UFC
8win0loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
0 (0%)KO/TKO() 0
8 (100%)Submission() 0
0 (0%)Decision() 0
Phan — win / loss by method
Record: 17-9-0

Bar length is fight count (largest bar = full width); shading splits finishes by round and decisions by unanimous vs split — tap a bar for the round-by-round count.

KO/TKO
7 wins, 3 losses
W
41% of wins
L
33% of losses
Submission
5 wins, 0 losses
W
29% of wins
L
0% of losses
Decision
5 wins, 6 losses
W
29% of wins
L
67% of losses
UFC
1win2loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
0 (0%)KO/TKO(0%) 0
0 (0%)Submission(0%) 0
1 (100%)Decision(100%) 2
Non-UFC
16win7loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
7 (44%)KO/TKO(43%) 3
5 (31%)Submission(0%) 0
4 (25%)Decision(57%) 4

Profiles

Experience
Hettes
Phan
1
UFC fights
3
8.2 min · 8.2 avg
Octagon time
45.0 min · 15.0 avg
17y 1m
Career length
24y 10m
UFC schedule strength

Opponents' records on fight night — toggle their full cross-promotional record vs UFC bouts only.

Hettes
Phan
5W–3L · 62.5%
Overall
53W–21L · 71.6%
5W–3L · 62.5%
Wins
15W–7L · 68.2%
0W–0L
Losses
38W–14L · 73.1%
Non-UFC schedule strength
Hettes
Phan
39W–23L · 62.9%
Overall
117W–65L · 64.3%
39W–23L · 62.9%
Wins
68W–48L · 58.6%
0W–0L
Losses
49W–17L · 74.2%
Distance striking
Hettes
Phan
0.00
Landed / min
10.04
0.0%
Accuracy
45.3%
62.5%
Defense
74.9%
0.00
Knockdowns / 15 min
0.00
13.2%
Time at distance
67.3%
Grappling & control
Hettes
Phan
9.15
Takedowns / 15 min
0.33
55.6%
Takedown accuracy
100.0%
Takedown defense
69.6%
3.66
Sub attempts / 15 min
0.33
67.3%
Control share
29.8%
Strike target map
Hettes
  • Head100%(2)div 61%
  • Body0%(0)div 20%
  • Legs0%(0)div 19%
Phan
  • Head75%(237)div 61%
  • Body23%(71)div 20%
  • Legs2%(6)div 19%

Where each fighter lands significant strikes (career). “div” = the weight-class average.

Jimy Hettes
CloseSSTDKDCtrl

Per-fight: SS & TD shown landed/attempted; Close = consensus closing line.

Nam Phan
CloseSSTDKDCtrl

Per-fight: SS & TD shown landed/attempted; Close = consensus closing line.