The Ultimate Fight Fan
+ Log a bet
UFC Fight Night: Henderson vs Khabilov
Jon Tuck
Jon Tuck
7-1 · GUM
VS
Jake Lindsey
Jake Lindsey
9-0 · USA
June 7, 2014 · Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
Lightweight · 3 rounds
Jon Tuck def. Jake Lindsey by KO/TKO (Kick), R3 2:47
Performance
Round by round
SSTDKDCtrl
R1
Tuck21/351/302:05
Lindsey20/310/101:18
R2
Tuck15/371/101:40
Lindsey29/440/101:08
R3 · 2:47
Tuck10/111/102:39
Lindsey0/00/000:00
Total
Tuck46/833/506:24
Lindsey49/750/202:26

Pre-fight

The model's read going in

The walk-forward model's call at the time of the bout — persisted out-of-sample, with no hindsight about the result.

Prediction
TuckWin probabilityLindsey
68.5%31.5%
KO / TKO
23%
Submission
20%
Decision
57%
Expected fight time: 10.8 min
What drives the pick

Each bar is a feature's push on the model from the center axis. Red pushes toward Tuck, blue toward Lindsey. Tap a bar for why.

Predicted outcomes
Tuck68%
Wins by
Model
Equity
Mkt
KO / TKO14%21%
Submission15%22%
Decision39%57%
Predicted output
Sig. strikes62 (3580)act 46
Takedowns1.3 (0.03.1)act 3
Lindsey32%
Wins by
Model
Equity
Mkt
KO / TKO8%27%
Submission6%17%
Decision18%56%
Predicted output
Sig. strikes57 (3274)act 49
Takedowns0.2 (0.01.1)act 0
Combined totals~119 sig strikes~1.5 takedownsmkt —
How it ends
mkt —
R126%
R210%
R37%
Distance57%
Fighter props
Most sig. strikestie 0.9%
Tuck
53.0%-115
Lindsey
+11546.1%
Most takedownstie 16.2%
Tuck
75.9%-961
Lindsey
+9617.9%
Significant strikes — over/under
Tuck
Expected: 61.5
61.5
Over 61.5
42.6%
+135
Under 61.5
57.4%
-135
077154
Lindsey
Expected: 57.1
57
Over 57
42.1%
+135
Exactly 57
1.2%
push
Under 57
56.8%
-135
072143
Takedowns — over/under
Tuck
Expected: 1.3
1.5
Over 1.5
50.5%
-102
Under 1.5
49.5%
+102
035
Lindsey
Expected: 0.2
0
Over 0
25.7%
Exactly 0
74.3%
push
Under 0
0.0%
035

Odds are model-implied (no real prop market is priced for these). The “most” prices are draw-no-bet — a tie (for takedowns, usually 0–0) is a push, so each side is priced off its chance of winning given a result, while the % shown is the raw chance of landing strictly more. Drag a line in half-point steps: a half line (e.g. 2.5) is a clean over/under, while a whole number adds a third outcome — landing exactly on it, a push — so over, exact and under sum to 100%. On a whole number the over/under odds are draw-no-bet (priced off the decisive mass, since the push refunds), so the two sides stay mirror images rather than implying an arbitrage.

Expected fight time 10.8 min. Predicted-output ranges are percentiles of the model’s simulated fights: sig strikes the middle 50% (25th–75th); takedowns the wider 10th–90th, since they’re 0 in most fights so a narrow band would collapse to 0. Win-by-method = win probability × that fighter’s own method split: the model forecasts how the fight ends, and that forecast is divided between the corners by each fighter’s finishing record — UFC wins in full, earlier-career wins at half weight, as of fight night — reconciled so the fighters’ totals still equal their win probabilities and the methods still total the fight-level forecast above. “Equity” is each of those over that fighter’s win % — how they win given that they win — so a column adds to 100%, and it differs by corner. A fighter with no classifiable wins at any level leans on the fight-level split. “How it ends” is the model’s round-of-finish split. “Mkt” is the de-vigged market prop (consensus across books), shown for context, not as a betting signal; rounds & totals slots fill as that data lands. Percentages are apportioned by largest remainder, so each set adds to its total exactly and an individual figure can sit a point off its own rounding.

Model vs market
Final
ModelMarketGapLine
To win
Tuck68.5%59.0%+9.5-150
Lindsey31.5%41.0%−9.5+140

Market % is the de-vigged (no-vig) consensus across the books that price both fighters; the line is the average across books with the min–max range in parentheses. Gap is the model minus the market in points (+ = the model rates that outcome above the market). Thin or one-sided markets are flagged or left blank rather than shown as a fabricated %. Shown for context, not as a bet — the closing line is the sharpest public price and the model trails it on average. For 5-round bouts the model splits its round-3+ finish mass into rounds 3–5 by the historical within-bucket rate, so the over-3.5 / 4.5 lines carry a model estimate.

Trait web
Str/minStr accStr defAbsorbedTD/15TD accTD defSubs
Hover a point to see the values
TuckLindsey
Tale of the tape
Ratings (Elo)
1522
Pound-for-pound
1531
1523
Divisional
1531
1500
Striking offense
1500
1498
Striking defense
1500
1487
Grappling offense
1500
1510
Grappling defense
1500
Physical
29 yrs
Age
27 yrs
5'11"
Height
5'11"
73"
Reach
Orthodox
Stance
Switch
Striking (UFC career)
3.43
Strikes landed / min
40%
Strike accuracy
4.03
Strikes absorbed / min
64%
Strike defense
Grappling (UFC career)
0.00
Takedowns / 15 min
0%
Takedown accuracy
0%
Takedown defense
1.0
Sub attempts / 15 min
Form & résumé
50%
UFC win rate
-1
Win/loss streak
50%
Last-5 win rate
0%
Finish rate
Recent opp. quality
224
Days since last fight
Recent form (last 5 UFC)
Jon Tuck
  • LNorman ParkeU-DEC R3
    Close +1657mo before
  • WZhang TiequanU-DEC R3
    Close -3151y 7mo before
Jake Lindsey
No prior UFC fights.
Tuck — win / loss by method
Record: 7-1-0

Bar length is fight count (largest bar = full width); shading splits finishes by round and decisions by unanimous vs split — tap a bar for the round-by-round count.

KO/TKO
3 wins, 0 losses
W
43% of wins
L
0% of losses
Submission
3 wins, 0 losses
W
43% of wins
L
0% of losses
Decision
1 win, 1 loss
W
14% of wins
L
100% of losses
UFC
1win1loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
0 (0%)KO/TKO(0%) 0
0 (0%)Submission(0%) 0
1 (100%)Decision(100%) 1
Non-UFC
6win0loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
3 (50%)KO/TKO() 0
3 (50%)Submission() 0
0 (0%)Decision() 0
Lindsey — win / loss by method
Record: 9-0-0

Bar length is fight count (largest bar = full width); shading splits finishes by round and decisions by unanimous vs split — tap a bar for the round-by-round count.

KO/TKO
5 wins, 0 losses
W
56% of wins
L
Submission
2 wins, 0 losses
W
22% of wins
L
Decision
2 wins, 0 losses
W
22% of wins
L
UFC
0win0loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
0 ()KO/TKO() 0
0 ()Submission() 0
0 ()Decision() 0
Non-UFC
9win0loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
5 (56%)KO/TKO() 0
2 (22%)Submission() 0
2 (22%)Decision() 0

Profiles

Experience
Tuck
Lindsey
2
UFC fights
0
30.0 min · 15.0 avg
Octagon time
19y 6m
Career length
UFC schedule strength

Opponents' records on fight night — toggle their full cross-promotional record vs UFC bouts only.

Tuck
Lindsey
33W–5L · 86.8%
Overall
15W–3L · 83.3%
Wins
18W–2L · 90.0%
Losses
Non-UFC schedule strength
Tuck
Lindsey
18W–4L · 81.8%
Overall
66W–64L · 50.8%
18W–4L · 81.8%
Wins
66W–64L · 50.8%
0W–0L
Losses
0W–0L
Distance striking
Tuck
Lindsey
4.61
Landed / min
39.1%
Accuracy
64.2%
Defense
0.00
Knockdowns / 15 min
71.6%
Time at distance
Grappling & control
Tuck
Lindsey
0.00
Takedowns / 15 min
0.0%
Takedown accuracy
0.0%
Takedown defense
1.00
Sub attempts / 15 min
82.9%
Control share
Strike target map
Tuck
  • Head57%(59)div 63%
  • Body22%(23)div 20%
  • Legs20%(21)div 17%
Lindsey
  • Head0%(0)div 63%
  • Body0%(0)div 20%
  • Legs0%(0)div 17%
  • No strike data on record.

Where each fighter lands significant strikes (career). “div” = the weight-class average.

Jon Tuck
CloseSSTDKDCtrl

Per-fight: SS & TD shown landed/attempted; Close = consensus closing line.

Jake Lindsey

No UFC fights on record.

Per-fight: SS & TD shown landed/attempted; Close = consensus closing line.