The Ultimate Fight Fan
+ Log a bet
UFC Fight Night: Edgar vs Faber
Guangyou Ning
Guangyou Ning
4-2-1 · CHN
VS
Royston Wee
Royston Wee
4-0 · SGP
May 16, 2015 · Manila, Philippines
Bantamweight · 3 rounds
Guangyou Ning def. Royston Wee by KO/TKO (Punch), R2 4:59
Performance
Round by round
SSTDKDCtrl
R1
Ning15/372/202:18
Wee9/130/000:00
R2 · 4:59
Ning31/550/000:55
Wee9/190/000:00
Total
Ning46/922/203:13
Wee18/320/000:00

Pre-fight

The model's read going in

The walk-forward model's call at the time of the bout — persisted out-of-sample, with no hindsight about the result.

Prediction
NingWin probabilityWee
64.1%35.9%
KO / TKO
18%
Submission
17%
Decision
65%
Expected fight time: 11.6 min
What drives the pick

Each bar is a feature's push on the model from the center axis. Red pushes toward Ning, blue toward Wee. Tap a bar for why.

Predicted outcomes
Ning64%
Wins by
Model
Equity
Mkt
KO / TKO14%21%
Submission10%16%
Decision40%63%
Predicted output
Sig. strikes33 (1843)act 46
Takedowns1.0 (0.03.0)act 2
Wee36%
Wins by
Model
Equity
Mkt
KO / TKO4%12%
Submission7%19%
Decision25%69%
Predicted output
Sig. strikes34 (1944)act 18
Takedowns1.1 (0.03.3)act 0
Combined totals~67 sig strikes~2.2 takedownsmkt —
How it ends
mkt —
R121%
R210%
R34%
Distance65%
Fighter props
Most sig. strikestie 1.6%
Ning
48.1%+105
Wee
-10550.3%
Most takedownstie 25.0%
Ning
36.9%+103
Wee
-10338.1%
Significant strikes — over/under
Ning
Expected: 33.2
33
Over 33
41.9%
+134
Exactly 33
2.0%
push
Under 33
56.1%
-134
04284
Wee
Expected: 34.0
34
Over 34
41.6%
+136
Exactly 34
1.9%
push
Under 34
56.5%
-136
04386
Takedowns — over/under
Ning
Expected: 1.0
1
Over 1
37.7%
+105
Exactly 1
22.7%
push
Under 1
39.6%
-105
035
Wee
Expected: 1.1
1
Over 1
39.1%
+102
Exactly 1
21.2%
push
Under 1
39.7%
-102
035

Odds are model-implied (no real prop market is priced for these). The “most” prices are draw-no-bet — a tie (for takedowns, usually 0–0) is a push, so each side is priced off its chance of winning given a result, while the % shown is the raw chance of landing strictly more. Drag a line in half-point steps: a half line (e.g. 2.5) is a clean over/under, while a whole number adds a third outcome — landing exactly on it, a push — so over, exact and under sum to 100%. On a whole number the over/under odds are draw-no-bet (priced off the decisive mass, since the push refunds), so the two sides stay mirror images rather than implying an arbitrage.

Expected fight time 11.6 min. Predicted-output ranges are percentiles of the model’s simulated fights: sig strikes the middle 50% (25th–75th); takedowns the wider 10th–90th, since they’re 0 in most fights so a narrow band would collapse to 0. Win-by-method = win probability × that fighter’s own method split: the model forecasts how the fight ends, and that forecast is divided between the corners by each fighter’s finishing record — UFC wins in full, earlier-career wins at half weight, as of fight night — reconciled so the fighters’ totals still equal their win probabilities and the methods still total the fight-level forecast above. “Equity” is each of those over that fighter’s win % — how they win given that they win — so a column adds to 100%, and it differs by corner. A fighter with no classifiable wins at any level leans on the fight-level split. “How it ends” is the model’s round-of-finish split. “Mkt” is the de-vigged market prop (consensus across books), shown for context, not as a betting signal; rounds & totals slots fill as that data lands. Percentages are apportioned by largest remainder, so each set adds to its total exactly and an individual figure can sit a point off its own rounding.

Model vs market
Final
ModelMarketGapLine
To win
Ning64.1%56.2%+7.9-140
Wee35.9%43.8%−7.9+120

Market % is the de-vigged (no-vig) consensus across the books that price both fighters; the line is the average across books with the min–max range in parentheses. Gap is the model minus the market in points (+ = the model rates that outcome above the market). Thin or one-sided markets are flagged or left blank rather than shown as a fabricated %. Shown for context, not as a bet — the closing line is the sharpest public price and the model trails it on average. For 5-round bouts the model splits its round-3+ finish mass into rounds 3–5 by the historical within-bucket rate, so the over-3.5 / 4.5 lines carry a model estimate.

Trait web
66.3Striking65.2
Ning +1.2
68.3Grappling47.5
Ning +20.8
Str/minStr accStr defAbsorbedTD/15TD accTD defSubs
Hover a point to see the values
NingWee
Tale of the tape
Ratings (Elo)
1512
Pound-for-pound
1536
1496
Divisional
1536
1480
Striking offense
1487
1506
Striking defense
1496
1552
Grappling offense
1507
1555
Grappling defense
1506
Physical
33 yrs
Age
28 yrs
5'4"
Height
5'7"
64"
Reach
67"
Southpaw
Stance
Orthodox
Striking (UFC career)
2.07
Strikes landed / min
0.87
34%
Strike accuracy
63%
1.40
Strikes absorbed / min
1.73
73%
Strike defense
50%
Grappling (UFC career)
2.00
Takedowns / 15 min
4.50
67%
Takedown accuracy
82%
75%
Takedown defense
1.0
Sub attempts / 15 min
0.0
Form & résumé
100%
UFC win rate
100%
+1
Win/loss streak
+2
100%
Last-5 win rate
100%
0%
Finish rate
0%
Recent opp. quality
266
Days since last fight
266
Recent form (last 5 UFC)
Guangyou Ning
  • WJianping YangU-DEC R3
    Close +2059mo before
Royston Wee
  • WYao ZhikuiS-DEC R3
    Close -2209mo before
  • WDave GaleraU-DEC R3
    Close +1751y 4mo before
Ning — win / loss by method
Record: 4-2-1

Bar length is fight count (largest bar = full width); shading splits finishes by round and decisions by unanimous vs split — tap a bar for the round-by-round count.

KO/TKO
2 wins, 0 losses
W
50% of wins
L
0% of losses
Submission
1 win, 1 loss
W
25% of wins
L
50% of losses
Decision
1 win, 1 loss
W
25% of wins
L
50% of losses
UFC
1win0loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
0 (0%)KO/TKO() 0
0 (0%)Submission() 0
1 (100%)Decision() 0
Non-UFC
3win2loss1draw0NC
WinsLosses
2 (67%)KO/TKO(0%) 0
1 (33%)Submission(50%) 1
0 (0%)Decision(50%) 1
Wee — win / loss by method
Record: 4-0-0

Bar length is fight count (largest bar = full width); shading splits finishes by round and decisions by unanimous vs split — tap a bar for the round-by-round count.

KO/TKO
0 wins, 0 losses
W
0% of wins
L
Submission
2 wins, 0 losses
W
50% of wins
L
Decision
2 wins, 0 losses
W
50% of wins
L
UFC
2win0loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
0 (0%)KO/TKO() 0
0 (0%)Submission() 0
2 (100%)Decision() 0
Non-UFC
2win0loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
0 (0%)KO/TKO() 0
2 (100%)Submission() 0
0 (0%)Decision() 0

Profiles

Experience
Ning
Wee
1
UFC fights
2
15.0 min · 15.0 avg
Octagon time
30.0 min · 15.0 avg
18y 10m
Career length
14y 8m
UFC schedule strength

Opponents' records on fight night — toggle their full cross-promotional record vs UFC bouts only.

Ning
Wee
7W–3L · 70.0%
Overall
8W–1L · 88.9%
7W–3L · 70.0%
Wins
8W–1L · 88.9%
0W–0L
Losses
0W–0L
Non-UFC schedule strength
Ning
Wee
16W–11L · 59.3%
Overall
0W–0L
2W–4L · 33.3%
Wins
0W–0L
14W–7L · 66.7%
Losses
0W–0L
Distance striking
Ning
Wee
2.33
Landed / min
3.30
32.6%
Accuracy
52.2%
72.7%
Defense
56.5%
0.00
Knockdowns / 15 min
0.00
80.2%
Time at distance
12.1%
Grappling & control
Ning
Wee
2.00
Takedowns / 15 min
4.50
66.7%
Takedown accuracy
81.8%
75.0%
Takedown defense
1.00
Sub attempts / 15 min
0.00
80.0%
Control share
84.3%
Strike target map
Ning
  • Head42%(13)div 63%
  • Body26%(8)div 21%
  • Legs32%(10)div 16%
Wee
  • Head50%(13)div 63%
  • Body12%(3)div 21%
  • Legs38%(10)div 16%

Where each fighter lands significant strikes (career). “div” = the weight-class average.

Guangyou Ning
CloseSSTDKDCtrl

Per-fight: SS & TD shown landed/attempted; Close = consensus closing line.

Royston Wee
CloseSSTDKDCtrl

Per-fight: SS & TD shown landed/attempted; Close = consensus closing line.