The Ultimate Fight Fan
+ Log a bet
UFC 316: Dvalishvili vs. O'Malley 2
Wang Cong
Wang Cong
6-1 · CHN
VS
Ariane da Silva
Ariane da Silva
17-10 · BRA
June 7, 2025 · Newark, New Jersey, USA
Flyweight · 132 lb · 3 rounds
Wang Cong def. Ariane da Silva by U-DEC, R3 5:00
Performance
Round by round
SSTDKDCtrl
R1
Cong46/650/000:00
da Silva17/410/200:00
R2
Cong42/640/010:16
da Silva19/590/100:03
R3
Cong55/930/000:00
da Silva27/760/100:00
Total
Cong143/2220/010:16
da Silva63/1760/400:03

Scorecards

Cong vs da Silva

RdJon BilykMunah QueridoTony TamburrinoCommunity
R110-910-910-99.9-9.1
R210-910-910-910-9
R310-910-910-99.8-9.2
Total30-2730-2730-2729.7-27.3

Media (11 cards) · avg 29.927.1 · 11 Cong · 0 da Silva

Official cards + public consensus via MMA Decisions. Per round: Cong-da Silva.

Pre-fight

The model's read going in

The walk-forward model's call at the time of the bout — persisted out-of-sample, with no hindsight about the result.

Prediction
CongWin probabilityda Silva
64.0%36.0%
KO / TKO
31%
Submission
19%
Decision
50%
Expected fight time: 10.5 min
Retrospective pick: the walk-forward model's call at the time of the fight — persisted out-of-sample, with no hindsight about the result.
What drives the pick

Each bar is a feature's push on the model from the center axis. Red pushes toward Cong, blue toward da Silva. Tap a bar for why.

Predicted outcomes
Cong64%
Wins by
Model
Equity
Mkt
KO / TKO21%32%29%
Submission11%17%15%
Decision32%51%35%
Predicted output
Sig. strikes50 (2168)act 143
Takedowns0.4 (0.01.9)act 0
da Silva36%
Wins by
Model
Equity
Mkt
KO / TKO10%28%5%
Submission8%23%5%
Decision18%49%10%
Predicted output
Sig. strikes38 (1651)act 63
Takedowns0.5 (0.02.1)act 0
Combined totals~88 sig strikes~0.9 takedownsmkt —
How it ends
mkt —
R126%
R212%
R312%
Distance50%
Fighter props
Most sig. strikestie 1.1%
Cong
58.5%-145
da Silva
+14540.4%
Most takedownstie 44.9%
Cong
25.8%+113
da Silva
-11329.3%
Significant strikes — over/under
Cong
Expected: 50.3
50.5
Over 50.5
39.5%
+153
Under 50.5
60.5%
-153
063126
da Silva
Expected: 37.9
38
Over 38
39.0%
+153
Exactly 38
1.3%
push
Under 38
59.7%
-153
04895
Takedowns — over/under
Cong
Expected: 0.4
0.5
Over 0.5
34.4%
+191
Under 0.5
65.6%
-191
035
da Silva
Expected: 0.5
0.5
Over 0.5
37.6%
+166
Under 0.5
62.4%
-166
035

Odds are model-implied (no real prop market is priced for these). The “most” prices are draw-no-bet — a tie (for takedowns, usually 0–0) is a push, so each side is priced off its chance of winning given a result, while the % shown is the raw chance of landing strictly more. Drag a line in half-point steps: a half line (e.g. 2.5) is a clean over/under, while a whole number adds a third outcome — landing exactly on it, a push — so over, exact and under sum to 100%. On a whole number the over/under odds are draw-no-bet (priced off the decisive mass, since the push refunds), so the two sides stay mirror images rather than implying an arbitrage.

Expected fight time 10.5 min. Predicted-output ranges are percentiles of the model’s simulated fights: sig strikes the middle 50% (25th–75th); takedowns the wider 10th–90th, since they’re 0 in most fights so a narrow band would collapse to 0. Win-by-method = win probability × that fighter’s own method split: the model forecasts how the fight ends, and that forecast is divided between the corners by each fighter’s finishing record — UFC wins in full, earlier-career wins at half weight, as of fight night — reconciled so the fighters’ totals still equal their win probabilities and the methods still total the fight-level forecast above. “Equity” is each of those over that fighter’s win % — how they win given that they win — so a column adds to 100%, and it differs by corner. A fighter with no classifiable wins at any level leans on the fight-level split. “How it ends” is the model’s round-of-finish split. “Mkt” is the de-vigged market prop (consensus across books), shown for context, not as a betting signal; rounds & totals slots fill as that data lands. Percentages are apportioned by largest remainder, so each set adds to its total exactly and an individual figure can sit a point off its own rounding.

Model vs market
Final
ModelMarketGapLine
To win
Cong64.0%81.2%−17.2-569
da Silva36.0%18.8%+17.2+407
By method
Cong by KO/TKO19.6%29.4%−9.8+175
Cong by submission12.3%14.7%−2.4+450
Cong by decision32.2%35.2%−3.0+130
da Silva by KO/TKO11.0%5.0%+6.0+1506
da Silva by submission6.9%5.5%+1.4+1374
da Silva by decision18.1%10.1%+8.0+700
Total rounds (over)
Over 1.5 rds74.0%66.3%+7.7-250
Over 2.5 rds61.6%49.0%+12.6-110
Goes the distance
Fight goes to decision50.3%45.7%+4.6+105

Market % is the de-vigged (no-vig) consensus across the books that price both fighters; the line is the average across books with the min–max range in parentheses. Gap is the model minus the market in points (+ = the model rates that outcome above the market). Thin or one-sided markets are flagged or left blank rather than shown as a fabricated %. Shown for context, not as a bet — the closing line is the sharpest public price and the model trails it on average. For 5-round bouts the model splits its round-3+ finish mass into rounds 3–5 by the historical within-bucket rate, so the over-3.5 / 4.5 lines carry a model estimate.

Trait web
86.0Striking62.4
Cong +23.6
56.0Grappling50.3
Cong +5.7
Str/minStr accStr defAbsorbedTD/15TD accTD defSubs
Hover a point to see the values
Congda Silva
Tale of the tape
Ratings (Elo)
1527
Pound-for-pound
1521
1527
Divisional
1532
1508
Striking offense
1509
1534
Striking defense
1490
1476
Grappling offense
1473
1505
Grappling defense
1504
Physical
33 yrs
Age
31 yrs
5'6"
Height
5'6"
66"
Reach
67"
Southpaw
Stance
Orthodox
Striking (UFC career)
6.40
Strikes landed / min
4.04
50%
Strike accuracy
42%
2.01
Strikes absorbed / min
3.87
62%
Strike defense
53%
Grappling (UFC career)
1.21
Takedowns / 15 min
0.52
67%
Takedown accuracy
56%
100%
Takedown defense
68%
0.0
Sub attempts / 15 min
0.3
Form & résumé
67%
UFC win rate
46%
+1
Win/loss streak
-2
67%
Last-5 win rate
60%
50%
Finish rate
33%
Recent opp. quality
119
Days since last fight
217
Recent form (last 5 UFC)
Wang Cong
  • WBruna BrasilU-DEC R3
    Close -3374mo before
  • LGabriella FernandesSUB R2
    Close -11266mo before
  • WVictoria LeonardoKO/TKO R1
    Close -13009mo before
Ariane da Silva
  • LJasmine JasudaviciusSUB R3
    Close +1907mo before
  • LKarine SilvaU-DEC R3
    Close +1351y 1mo before
  • WCasey O'NeillSUB R2
    Close +1601y 6mo before
  • WMelissa GattoS-DEC R3
    Close +1901y 11mo before
  • WJJ AldrichU-DEC R3
    Close +2802y 3mo before
Cong — win / loss by method
Record: 6-1-0

Bar length is fight count (largest bar = full width); shading splits finishes by round and decisions by unanimous vs split — tap a bar for the round-by-round count.

KO/TKO
2 wins, 0 losses
W
33% of wins
L
0% of losses
Submission
1 win, 1 loss
W
17% of wins
L
100% of losses
Decision
3 wins, 0 losses
W
50% of wins
L
0% of losses
UFC
2win1loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
1 (50%)KO/TKO(0%) 0
0 (0%)Submission(100%) 1
1 (50%)Decision(0%) 0
Non-UFC
4win0loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
1 (25%)KO/TKO() 0
1 (25%)Submission() 0
2 (50%)Decision() 0
da Silva — win / loss by method
Record: 17-10-0

Bar length is fight count (largest bar = full width); shading splits finishes by round and decisions by unanimous vs split — tap a bar for the round-by-round count.

KO/TKO
6 wins, 4 losses
W
35% of wins
L
40% of losses
Submission
4 wins, 1 loss
W
24% of wins
L
10% of losses
Decision
7 wins, 5 losses
W
41% of wins
L
50% of losses
UFC
6win7loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
0 (0%)KO/TKO(43%) 3
2 (33%)Submission(14%) 1
4 (67%)Decision(43%) 3
Non-UFC
11win3loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
6 (55%)KO/TKO(33%) 1
2 (18%)Submission(0%) 0
3 (27%)Decision(67%) 2

Profiles

Experience
Cong
da Silva
3
UFC fights
13
24.9 min · 8.3 avg
Octagon time
145.3 min · 11.2 avg
4y 1m
Career length
12y 9m
UFC schedule strength

Opponents' records on fight night — toggle their full cross-promotional record vs UFC bouts only.

Cong
da Silva
28W–13L · 68.3%
Overall
124W–33L · 79.0%
19W–10L · 65.5%
Wins
46W–9L · 83.6%
9W–3L · 75.0%
Losses
78W–24L · 76.5%
Non-UFC schedule strength
Cong
da Silva
20W–11L · 64.5%
Overall
63W–32L · 66.3%
20W–11L · 64.5%
Wins
55W–30L · 64.7%
0W–0L
Losses
8W–2L · 80.0%
Distance striking
Cong
da Silva
6.53
Landed / min
6.17
50.3%
Accuracy
37.3%
62.3%
Defense
59.4%
0.60
Knockdowns / 15 min
0.31
97.4%
Time at distance
51.2%
Grappling & control
Cong
da Silva
1.21
Takedowns / 15 min
0.52
66.7%
Takedown accuracy
55.6%
100.0%
Takedown defense
68.0%
0.00
Sub attempts / 15 min
0.31
15.2%
Control share
34.2%
Strike target map
Cong
  • Head36%(57)div 62%
  • Body27%(43)div 22%
  • Legs37%(59)div 16%
da Silva
  • Head49%(290)div 62%
  • Body39%(231)div 22%
  • Legs11%(66)div 16%

Where each fighter lands significant strikes (career). “div” = the weight-class average.

Wang Cong
CloseSSTDKDCtrl

Per-fight: SS & TD shown landed/attempted; Close = consensus closing line.

Ariane da Silva
CloseSSTDKDCtrl

Per-fight: SS & TD shown landed/attempted; Close = consensus closing line.