The Ultimate Fight Fan
+ Log a bet
UFC 213: Romero vs. Whittaker
Chad Laprise
Chad Laprise
11-2 · CAN
VS
Brian Camozzi
Brian Camozzi
7-3 · USA
July 8, 2017 · Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Welterweight · 3 rounds
Chad Laprise def. Brian Camozzi by KO/TKO (Punch), R3 1:27
Performance
Round by round
SSTDKDCtrl
R1
Laprise36/741/100:26
Camozzi20/740/000:00
R2
Laprise20/640/000:00
Camozzi22/800/000:00
R3 · 1:27
Laprise20/410/010:05
Camozzi5/280/000:00
Total
Laprise76/1791/110:31
Camozzi47/1820/000:00

Pre-fight

The model's read going in

The walk-forward model's call at the time of the bout — persisted out-of-sample, with no hindsight about the result.

Prediction
LapriseWin probabilityCamozzi
54.0%46.0%
KO / TKO
38%
Submission
10%
Decision
52%
Expected fight time: 10.9 min
What drives the pick

Each bar is a feature's push on the model from the center axis. Red pushes toward Laprise, blue toward Camozzi. Tap a bar for why.

Predicted outcomes
Laprise54%
Wins by
Model
Equity
Mkt
KO / TKO20%36%
Submission2%5%
Decision32%59%
Predicted output
Sig. strikes57 (3274)act 76
Takedowns0.8 (0.02.7)act 1
Camozzi46%
Wins by
Model
Equity
Mkt
KO / TKO19%41%
Submission7%15%
Decision20%44%
Predicted output
Sig. strikes48 (2763)act 47
Takedowns0.2 (0.00.8)act 0
Combined totals~105 sig strikes~1.0 takedownsmkt —
How it ends
mkt —
R119%
R220%
R39%
Distance52%
Fighter props
Most sig. strikestie 1.0%
Laprise
57.1%-136
Camozzi
+13641.9%
Most takedownstie 49.8%
Laprise
38.9%-345
Camozzi
+34511.3%
Significant strikes — over/under
Laprise
Expected: 56.6
56.5
Over 56.5
42.7%
+134
Under 56.5
57.3%
-134
071142
Camozzi
Expected: 48.0
48
Over 48
41.9%
+135
Exactly 48
1.4%
push
Under 48
56.7%
-135
061121
Takedowns — over/under
Laprise
Expected: 0.8
1
Over 1
27.2%
+210
Exactly 1
15.7%
push
Under 1
57.1%
-210
035
Camozzi
Expected: 0.2
0
Over 0
16.4%
Exactly 0
83.6%
push
Under 0
0.0%
035

Odds are model-implied (no real prop market is priced for these). The “most” prices are draw-no-bet — a tie (for takedowns, usually 0–0) is a push, so each side is priced off its chance of winning given a result, while the % shown is the raw chance of landing strictly more. Drag a line in half-point steps: a half line (e.g. 2.5) is a clean over/under, while a whole number adds a third outcome — landing exactly on it, a push — so over, exact and under sum to 100%. On a whole number the over/under odds are draw-no-bet (priced off the decisive mass, since the push refunds), so the two sides stay mirror images rather than implying an arbitrage.

Expected fight time 10.9 min. Predicted-output ranges are percentiles of the model’s simulated fights: sig strikes the middle 50% (25th–75th); takedowns the wider 10th–90th, since they’re 0 in most fights so a narrow band would collapse to 0. Win-by-method = win probability × that fighter’s own method split: the model forecasts how the fight ends, and that forecast is divided between the corners by each fighter’s finishing record — UFC wins in full, earlier-career wins at half weight, as of fight night — reconciled so the fighters’ totals still equal their win probabilities and the methods still total the fight-level forecast above. “Equity” is each of those over that fighter’s win % — how they win given that they win — so a column adds to 100%, and it differs by corner. A fighter with no classifiable wins at any level leans on the fight-level split. “How it ends” is the model’s round-of-finish split. “Mkt” is the de-vigged market prop (consensus across books), shown for context, not as a betting signal; rounds & totals slots fill as that data lands. Percentages are apportioned by largest remainder, so each set adds to its total exactly and an individual figure can sit a point off its own rounding.

Model vs market
Final
ModelMarketGapLine
To win
Laprise54.0%81.6%−27.6-550
Camozzi46.0%18.4%+27.6+425

Market % is the de-vigged (no-vig) consensus across the books that price both fighters; the line is the average across books with the min–max range in parentheses. Gap is the model minus the market in points (+ = the model rates that outcome above the market). Thin or one-sided markets are flagged or left blank rather than shown as a fabricated %. Shown for context, not as a bet — the closing line is the sharpest public price and the model trails it on average. For 5-round bouts the model splits its round-3+ finish mass into rounds 3–5 by the historical within-bucket rate, so the over-3.5 / 4.5 lines carry a model estimate.

Trait web
69.5Striking38.5
Laprise +31.0
49.2Grappling25.0
Laprise +24.2
Str/minStr accStr defAbsorbedTD/15TD accTD defSubs
Hover a point to see the values
LapriseCamozzi
Tale of the tape
Ratings (Elo)
1555
Pound-for-pound
1496
1542
Divisional
1496
1511
Striking offense
1501
1503
Striking defense
1493
1480
Grappling offense
1494
1512
Grappling defense
1496
Physical
30 yrs
Age
26 yrs
5'10"
Height
6'2"
71"
Reach
78"
Orthodox
Stance
Orthodox
Striking (UFC career)
4.56
Strikes landed / min
1.71
42%
Strike accuracy
31%
3.56
Strikes absorbed / min
6.55
63%
Strike defense
49%
Grappling (UFC career)
0.93
Takedowns / 15 min
0.00
50%
Takedown accuracy
0%
79%
Takedown defense
0%
0.0
Sub attempts / 15 min
2.3
Form & résumé
67%
UFC win rate
0%
+1
Win/loss streak
-1
60%
Last-5 win rate
0%
25%
Finish rate
Recent opp. quality
315
Days since last fight
211
Recent form (last 5 UFC)
Chad Laprise
  • WThibault GoutiKO/TKO R1
    missedClose -32010mo before
  • LRoss PearsonS-DEC R3
    Close -1151y 4mo before
  • LFrancisco TrinaldoKO/TKO R1
    Close -4601y 11mo before
  • WBryan BarberenaU-DEC R3
    Close -4202y 2mo before
  • WYosdenis CedenoU-DEC R3
    Close -3202y 9mo before
Brian Camozzi
  • LRandy BrownKO/TKO R2
    Close +1307mo before
Laprise — win / loss by method
Record: 11-2-0

Bar length is fight count (largest bar = full width); shading splits finishes by round and decisions by unanimous vs split — tap a bar for the round-by-round count.

KO/TKO
5 wins, 1 loss
W
45% of wins
L
50% of losses
Submission
1 win, 0 losses
W
9% of wins
L
0% of losses
Decision
5 wins, 1 loss
W
45% of wins
L
50% of losses
UFC
4win2loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
1 (25%)KO/TKO(50%) 1
0 (0%)Submission(0%) 0
3 (75%)Decision(50%) 1
Non-UFC
7win0loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
4 (57%)KO/TKO() 0
1 (14%)Submission() 0
2 (29%)Decision() 0
Camozzi — win / loss by method
Record: 7-3-0

Bar length is fight count (largest bar = full width); shading splits finishes by round and decisions by unanimous vs split — tap a bar for the round-by-round count.

KO/TKO
3 wins, 1 loss
W
43% of wins
L
33% of losses
Submission
4 wins, 0 losses
W
57% of wins
L
0% of losses
Decision
0 wins, 2 losses
W
0% of wins
L
67% of losses
UFC
0win1loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
0 ()KO/TKO(100%) 1
0 ()Submission(0%) 0
0 ()Decision(0%) 0
Non-UFC
7win2loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
3 (43%)KO/TKO(0%) 0
4 (57%)Submission(0%) 0
0 (0%)Decision(100%) 2

Profiles

Experience
Laprise
Camozzi
6
UFC fights
1
64.3 min · 10.7 avg
Octagon time
6.4 min · 6.4 avg
16y 1m
Career length
13y 6m
UFC schedule strength

Opponents' records on fight night — toggle their full cross-promotional record vs UFC bouts only.

Laprise
Camozzi
70W–21L · 76.9%
Overall
8W–1L · 88.9%
35W–7L · 83.3%
Wins
0W–0L
35W–14L · 71.4%
Losses
8W–1L · 88.9%
Non-UFC schedule strength
Laprise
Camozzi
17W–10L · 63.0%
Overall
46W–18L · 71.9%
17W–10L · 63.0%
Wins
37W–14L · 72.5%
0W–0L
Losses
9W–4L · 69.2%
Distance striking
Laprise
Camozzi
5.40
Landed / min
5.88
41.3%
Accuracy
32.3%
66.8%
Defense
66.7%
0.47
Knockdowns / 15 min
0.00
77.2%
Time at distance
26.5%
Grappling & control
Laprise
Camozzi
0.93
Takedowns / 15 min
0.00
50.0%
Takedown accuracy
0.0%
78.6%
Takedown defense
0.0%
0.00
Sub attempts / 15 min
2.34
73.4%
Control share
11.2%
Strike target map
Laprise
  • Head61%(180)div 63%
  • Body18%(53)div 21%
  • Legs20%(60)div 16%
Camozzi
  • Head27%(3)div 63%
  • Body0%(0)div 21%
  • Legs73%(8)div 16%

Where each fighter lands significant strikes (career). “div” = the weight-class average.

Chad Laprise
CloseSSTDKDCtrl

Per-fight: SS & TD shown landed/attempted; Close = consensus closing line.

Brian Camozzi
CloseSSTDKDCtrl

Per-fight: SS & TD shown landed/attempted; Close = consensus closing line.