The Ultimate Fight Fan
+ Log a bet
UFC Fight Night: Dos Anjos vs. Lee
Zak Cummings
Zak Cummings
22-6 · USA
VS
Trevin Giles
Trevin Giles
11-0 · USA
May 18, 2019 · Rochester, New York, USA
Middleweight · 3 rounds
Zak Cummings def. Trevin Giles by SUB (Guillotine Choke), R3 4:01
Performance
Round by round
SSTDKDCtrl
R1
Cummings9/260/000:12
Giles13/200/000:06
R2
Cummings11/400/100:09
Giles9/200/000:00
R3 · 4:01
Cummings14/340/110:05
Giles9/240/000:18
Total
Cummings34/1000/210:26
Giles31/640/000:24

Pre-fight

The model's read going in

The walk-forward model's call at the time of the bout — persisted out-of-sample, with no hindsight about the result.

Prediction
CummingsWin probabilityGiles
50.5%49.5%
KO / TKO
19%
Submission
6%
Decision
75%
Expected fight time: 13.0 min
What drives the pick

Each bar is a feature's push on the model from the center axis. Red pushes toward Cummings, blue toward Giles. Tap a bar for why.

Predicted outcomes
Cummings50%
Wins by
Model
Equity
Mkt
KO / TKO7%15%
Submission4%7%
Decision39%78%
Predicted output
Sig. strikes42 (2455)act 34
Takedowns0.8 (0.02.8)act 0
Giles50%
Wins by
Model
Equity
Mkt
KO / TKO12%24%
Submission2%4%
Decision36%72%
Predicted output
Sig. strikes40 (2353)act 31
Takedowns0.2 (0.00.8)act 0
Combined totals~83 sig strikes~1.0 takedownsmkt —
How it ends
mkt —
R18%
R211%
R36%
Distance75%
Fighter props
Most sig. strikestie 1.3%
Cummings
51.5%-109
Giles
+10947.2%
Most takedownstie 48.9%
Cummings
39.6%-345
Giles
+34511.5%
Significant strikes — over/under
Cummings
Expected: 42.3
42.5
Over 42.5
42.2%
+137
Under 42.5
57.8%
-137
053106
Giles
Expected: 40.4
40.5
Over 40.5
42.3%
+137
Under 40.5
57.7%
-137
051101
Takedowns — over/under
Cummings
Expected: 0.8
1
Over 1
28.3%
+199
Exactly 1
15.3%
push
Under 1
56.4%
-199
035
Giles
Expected: 0.2
0
Over 0
17.0%
Exactly 0
83.0%
push
Under 0
0.0%
035

Odds are model-implied (no real prop market is priced for these). The “most” prices are draw-no-bet — a tie (for takedowns, usually 0–0) is a push, so each side is priced off its chance of winning given a result, while the % shown is the raw chance of landing strictly more. Drag a line in half-point steps: a half line (e.g. 2.5) is a clean over/under, while a whole number adds a third outcome — landing exactly on it, a push — so over, exact and under sum to 100%. On a whole number the over/under odds are draw-no-bet (priced off the decisive mass, since the push refunds), so the two sides stay mirror images rather than implying an arbitrage.

Expected fight time 13.0 min. Predicted-output ranges are percentiles of the model’s simulated fights: sig strikes the middle 50% (25th–75th); takedowns the wider 10th–90th, since they’re 0 in most fights so a narrow band would collapse to 0. Win-by-method = win probability × that fighter’s own method split: the model forecasts how the fight ends, and that forecast is divided between the corners by each fighter’s finishing record — UFC wins in full, earlier-career wins at half weight, as of fight night — reconciled so the fighters’ totals still equal their win probabilities and the methods still total the fight-level forecast above. “Equity” is each of those over that fighter’s win % — how they win given that they win — so a column adds to 100%, and it differs by corner. A fighter with no classifiable wins at any level leans on the fight-level split. “How it ends” is the model’s round-of-finish split. “Mkt” is the de-vigged market prop (consensus across books), shown for context, not as a betting signal; rounds & totals slots fill as that data lands. Percentages are apportioned by largest remainder, so each set adds to its total exactly and an individual figure can sit a point off its own rounding.

Model vs market
Final
ModelMarketGapLine
To win
Cummings50.5%35.7%+14.8+170
Giles49.5%64.3%−14.8-200

Market % is the de-vigged (no-vig) consensus across the books that price both fighters; the line is the average across books with the min–max range in parentheses. Gap is the model minus the market in points (+ = the model rates that outcome above the market). Thin or one-sided markets are flagged or left blank rather than shown as a fabricated %. Shown for context, not as a bet — the closing line is the sharpest public price and the model trails it on average. For 5-round bouts the model splits its round-3+ finish mass into rounds 3–5 by the historical within-bucket rate, so the over-3.5 / 4.5 lines carry a model estimate.

Trait web
58.4Striking91.3
Giles +32.9
51.2Grappling61.9
Giles +10.7
Str/minStr accStr defAbsorbedTD/15TD accTD defSubs
Hover a point to see the values
CummingsGiles
Tale of the tape
Ratings (Elo)
1590
Pound-for-pound
1561
1562
Divisional
1546
1485
Striking offense
1514
1521
Striking defense
1509
1501
Grappling offense
1501
1519
Grappling defense
1512
Physical
34 yrs
Age
26 yrs
6'0"
Height
6'0"
75"
Reach
74"
Southpaw
Stance
Orthodox
Striking (UFC career)
2.80
Strikes landed / min
5.45
32%
Strike accuracy
67%
2.75
Strikes absorbed / min
1.13
53%
Strike defense
76%
Grappling (UFC career)
1.02
Takedowns / 15 min
3.69
35%
Takedown accuracy
100%
70%
Takedown defense
67%
0.9
Sub attempts / 15 min
0.0
Form & résumé
70%
UFC win rate
100%
+1
Win/loss streak
+2
60%
Last-5 win rate
100%
57%
Finish rate
100%
Recent opp. quality
154
Days since last fight
525
Recent form (last 5 UFC)
Zak Cummings
  • WTrevor SmithU-DEC R3
    Close -3305mo before
  • LMichel PrazeresS-DEC R3
    Close -1901y before
  • WNathan CoySUB R1
    Close -5502y 1mo before
  • WAlexander YakovlevSUB R2
    missedClose -1702y 6mo before
  • LSantiago PonzinibbioU-DEC R3
    Close -1102y 9mo before
Trevin Giles
  • WAntonio Braga NetoKO/TKO R3
    Close -2701y 5mo before
  • WJames BochnovicKO/TKO R2
    Close -2501y 10mo before
Cummings — win / loss by method
Record: 22-6-0

Bar length is fight count (largest bar = full width); shading splits finishes by round and decisions by unanimous vs split — tap a bar for the round-by-round count.

KO/TKO
5 wins, 0 losses
W
23% of wins
L
0% of losses
Submission
11 wins, 2 losses
W
50% of wins
L
33% of losses
Decision
6 wins, 4 losses
W
27% of wins
L
67% of losses
UFC
7win3loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
1 (14%)KO/TKO(0%) 0
3 (43%)Submission(33%) 1
3 (43%)Decision(67%) 2
Non-UFC
15win3loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
4 (27%)KO/TKO(0%) 0
8 (53%)Submission(33%) 1
3 (20%)Decision(67%) 2
Giles — win / loss by method
Record: 11-0-0

Bar length is fight count (largest bar = full width); shading splits finishes by round and decisions by unanimous vs split — tap a bar for the round-by-round count.

KO/TKO
5 wins, 0 losses
W
45% of wins
L
Submission
5 wins, 0 losses
W
45% of wins
L
Decision
1 win, 0 losses
W
9% of wins
L
UFC
2win0loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
2 (100%)KO/TKO() 0
0 (0%)Submission() 0
0 (0%)Decision() 0
Non-UFC
9win0loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
3 (33%)KO/TKO() 0
5 (56%)Submission() 0
1 (11%)Decision() 0

Profiles

Experience
Cummings
Giles
10
UFC fights
2
103.2 min · 10.3 avg
Octagon time
20.4 min · 10.2 avg
18y 8m
Career length
12y 6m
UFC schedule strength

Opponents' records on fight night — toggle their full cross-promotional record vs UFC bouts only.

Cummings
Giles
162W–36L · 81.8%
Overall
17W–3L · 85.0%
104W–31L · 77.0%
Wins
17W–3L · 85.0%
58W–5L · 92.1%
Losses
0W–0L
Non-UFC schedule strength
Cummings
Giles
187W–115L · 61.9%
Overall
52W–33L · 61.2%
157W–110L · 58.8%
Wins
52W–33L · 61.2%
30W–5L · 85.7%
Losses
0W–0L
Distance striking
Cummings
Giles
3.20
Landed / min
7.18
28.1%
Accuracy
61.3%
56.1%
Defense
78.7%
0.44
Knockdowns / 15 min
0.74
65.4%
Time at distance
52.0%
Grappling & control
Cummings
Giles
1.02
Takedowns / 15 min
3.69
35.0%
Takedown accuracy
100.0%
69.6%
Takedown defense
66.7%
0.87
Sub attempts / 15 min
0.00
66.6%
Control share
64.7%
Strike target map
Cummings
  • Head62%(179)div 63%
  • Body19%(54)div 19%
  • Legs19%(56)div 18%
Giles
  • Head86%(96)div 63%
  • Body11%(12)div 19%
  • Legs3%(3)div 18%

Where each fighter lands significant strikes (career). “div” = the weight-class average.

Zak Cummings
CloseSSTDKDCtrl

Per-fight: SS & TD shown landed/attempted; Close = consensus closing line.

Trevin Giles
CloseSSTDKDCtrl

Per-fight: SS & TD shown landed/attempted; Close = consensus closing line.