The Ultimate Fight Fan
+ Log a bet
UFC Fight Night: De Randamie vs. Ladd
Karl Roberson
Karl Roberson
7-2 · USA
VS
July 13, 2019 · Sacramento, California, USA
Middleweight · 3 rounds
185.5lb
Weigh-in
185.0lb
Karl Roberson def. Wellington Turman by S-DEC, R3 5:00
Performance
Round by round
SSTDKDCtrl
R1
Roberson23/380/003:14
Turman9/161/400:57
R2
Roberson17/260/001:54
Turman8/212/202:14
R3
Roberson10/160/000:40
Turman8/141/103:44
Total
Roberson50/800/005:48
Turman25/514/706:55

Scorecards

Roberson vs Turman

RdDerek ClearyMichael BellWade VierraCommunity
R110-910-910-910-9
R29-1010-910-99.2-9.8
R39-109-109-109-10
Total28-2929-2829-2828.2-28.8

Media (12 cards) · avg 2928 · 12 Roberson · 0 Turman

Official cards + public consensus via MMA Decisions. Per round: Roberson-Turman.

Pre-fight

The model's read going in

The walk-forward model's call at the time of the bout — persisted out-of-sample, with no hindsight about the result.

Prediction
RobersonWin probabilityTurman
42.2%57.8%
KO / TKO
39%
Submission
21%
Decision
40%
Expected fight time: 9.2 min
What drives the pick

Each bar is a feature's push on the model from the center axis. Red pushes toward Roberson, blue toward Turman. Tap a bar for why.

Predicted outcomes
Roberson42%
Wins by
Model
Equity
Mkt
KO / TKO16%38%
Submission8%20%
Decision18%42%
Predicted output
Sig. strikes32 (1741)act 50
Takedowns0.5 (0.02.1)act 0
Turman58%
Wins by
Model
Equity
Mkt
KO / TKO23%39%
Submission13%23%
Decision22%38%
Predicted output
Sig. strikes32 (1841)act 25
Takedowns0.8 (0.02.8)act 4
Combined totals~64 sig strikes~1.4 takedownsmkt —
How it ends
mkt —
R133%
R221%
R37%
Distance39%
Fighter props
Most sig. strikestie 1.7%
Roberson
48.9%+101
Turman
-10149.3%
Most takedownstie 40.1%
Roberson
24.4%+145
Turman
-14535.5%
Significant strikes — over/under
Roberson
Expected: 31.7
31.5
Over 31.5
42.9%
+133
Under 31.5
57.1%
-133
04080
Turman
Expected: 31.8
32
Over 32
41.1%
+138
Exactly 32
2.1%
push
Under 32
56.9%
-138
04080
Takedowns — over/under
Roberson
Expected: 0.5
0.5
Over 0.5
35.0%
+186
Under 0.5
65.0%
-186
035
Turman
Expected: 0.8
1
Over 1
29.1%
+190
Exactly 1
15.4%
push
Under 1
55.5%
-190
035

Odds are model-implied (no real prop market is priced for these). The “most” prices are draw-no-bet — a tie (for takedowns, usually 0–0) is a push, so each side is priced off its chance of winning given a result, while the % shown is the raw chance of landing strictly more. Drag a line in half-point steps: a half line (e.g. 2.5) is a clean over/under, while a whole number adds a third outcome — landing exactly on it, a push — so over, exact and under sum to 100%. On a whole number the over/under odds are draw-no-bet (priced off the decisive mass, since the push refunds), so the two sides stay mirror images rather than implying an arbitrage.

Expected fight time 9.2 min. Predicted-output ranges are percentiles of the model’s simulated fights: sig strikes the middle 50% (25th–75th); takedowns the wider 10th–90th, since they’re 0 in most fights so a narrow band would collapse to 0. Win-by-method = win probability × that fighter’s own method split: the model forecasts how the fight ends, and that forecast is divided between the corners by each fighter’s finishing record — UFC wins in full, earlier-career wins at half weight, as of fight night — reconciled so the fighters’ totals still equal their win probabilities and the methods still total the fight-level forecast above. “Equity” is each of those over that fighter’s win % — how they win given that they win — so a column adds to 100%, and it differs by corner. A fighter with no classifiable wins at any level leans on the fight-level split. “How it ends” is the model’s round-of-finish split. “Mkt” is the de-vigged market prop (consensus across books), shown for context, not as a betting signal; rounds & totals slots fill as that data lands. Percentages are apportioned by largest remainder, so each set adds to its total exactly and an individual figure can sit a point off its own rounding.

Model vs market
Final
ModelMarketGapLine
To win
Roberson42.2%65.8%−23.6-220
Turman57.8%34.2%+23.6+180

Market % is the de-vigged (no-vig) consensus across the books that price both fighters; the line is the average across books with the min–max range in parentheses. Gap is the model minus the market in points (+ = the model rates that outcome above the market). Thin or one-sided markets are flagged or left blank rather than shown as a fabricated %. Shown for context, not as a bet — the closing line is the sharpest public price and the model trails it on average. For 5-round bouts the model splits its round-3+ finish mass into rounds 3–5 by the historical within-bucket rate, so the over-3.5 / 4.5 lines carry a model estimate.

Trait web
Str/minStr accStr defAbsorbedTD/15TD accTD defSubs
Hover a point to see the values
RobersonTurman
Tale of the tape
Ratings (Elo)
1523
Pound-for-pound
1536
1536
Divisional
1536
1497
Striking offense
1500
1532
Striking defense
1500
1504
Grappling offense
1500
1502
Grappling defense
1500
Physical
28 yrs
Age
22 yrs
6'1"
Height
6'0"
74"
Reach
72"
Southpaw
Stance
Orthodox
Striking (UFC career)
2.95
Strikes landed / min
61%
Strike accuracy
1.42
Strikes absorbed / min
72%
Strike defense
Grappling (UFC career)
1.68
Takedowns / 15 min
75%
Takedown accuracy
57%
Takedown defense
1.1
Sub attempts / 15 min
Form & résumé
50%
UFC win rate
-1
Win/loss streak
50%
Last-5 win rate
50%
Finish rate
Recent opp. quality
175
Days since last fight
Recent form (last 5 UFC)
Karl Roberson
  • LGlover TeixeiraSUB R1
    Close -1106mo before
  • WJack MarshmanU-DEC R3
    Close -3258mo before
  • LCezar FerreiraSUB R1
    Close +1301y 2mo before
  • WDarren StewartSUB R1
    Close -2551y 8mo before
Wellington Turman
No prior UFC fights.
Roberson — win / loss by method
Record: 7-2-0

Bar length is fight count (largest bar = full width); shading splits finishes by round and decisions by unanimous vs split — tap a bar for the round-by-round count.

KO/TKO
2 wins, 0 losses
W
29% of wins
L
0% of losses
Submission
3 wins, 2 losses
W
43% of wins
L
100% of losses
Decision
2 wins, 0 losses
W
29% of wins
L
0% of losses
UFC
2win2loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
0 (0%)KO/TKO(0%) 0
1 (50%)Submission(100%) 2
1 (50%)Decision(0%) 0
Non-UFC
5win0loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
2 (40%)KO/TKO() 0
2 (40%)Submission() 0
1 (20%)Decision() 0
Turman — win / loss by method
Record: 15-2-0

Bar length is fight count (largest bar = full width); shading splits finishes by round and decisions by unanimous vs split — tap a bar for the round-by-round count.

KO/TKO
4 wins, 0 losses
W
27% of wins
L
0% of losses
Submission
7 wins, 0 losses
W
47% of wins
L
0% of losses
Decision
4 wins, 2 losses
W
27% of wins
L
100% of losses
UFC
0win0loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
0 ()KO/TKO() 0
0 ()Submission() 0
0 ()Decision() 0
Non-UFC
15win2loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
4 (27%)KO/TKO(0%) 0
7 (47%)Submission(0%) 0
4 (27%)Decision(100%) 2

Profiles

Experience
Roberson
Turman
4
UFC fights
0
26.8 min · 6.7 avg
Octagon time
11y 2m
Career length
UFC schedule strength

Opponents' records on fight night — toggle their full cross-promotional record vs UFC bouts only.

Roberson
Turman
68W–21L · 76.4%
Overall
29W–8L · 78.4%
Wins
39W–13L · 75.0%
Losses
Non-UFC schedule strength
Roberson
Turman
25W–10L · 71.4%
Overall
109W–61L · 64.1%
25W–10L · 71.4%
Wins
90W–55L · 62.1%
0W–0L
Losses
19W–6L · 76.0%
Distance striking
Roberson
Turman
2.72
Landed / min
43.1%
Accuracy
79.5%
Defense
0.56
Knockdowns / 15 min
42.5%
Time at distance
Grappling & control
Roberson
Turman
1.68
Takedowns / 15 min
75.0%
Takedown accuracy
57.1%
Takedown defense
1.12
Sub attempts / 15 min
51.2%
Control share
Strike target map
Roberson
  • Head77%(61)div 63%
  • Body16%(13)div 19%
  • Legs6%(5)div 18%
Turman
  • Head0%(0)div 63%
  • Body0%(0)div 19%
  • Legs0%(0)div 18%
  • No strike data on record.

Where each fighter lands significant strikes (career). “div” = the weight-class average.

Karl Roberson
CloseSSTDKDCtrl

Per-fight: SS & TD shown landed/attempted; Close = consensus closing line.

Wellington Turman

No UFC fights on record.

Per-fight: SS & TD shown landed/attempted; Close = consensus closing line.