The Ultimate Fight Fan
+ Log a bet
UFC Fight Night: Edgar vs. The Korean Zombie
Amanda Lemos
Amanda Lemos
6-1-1 · BRA
VS
Miranda Granger
Miranda Granger
7-0 · USA
December 21, 2019 · Busan, South Korea
Strawweight · 3 rounds
Amanda Lemos def. Miranda Granger by SUB (Rear Naked Choke), R1 3:43
Performance
Round by round
SSTDKDCtrl
R1 · 3:43
Lemos8/121/102:20
Granger4/80/000:06
Total
Lemos8/121/102:20
Granger4/80/000:06

Pre-fight

The model's read going in

The walk-forward model's call at the time of the bout — persisted out-of-sample, with no hindsight about the result.

Prediction
LemosWin probabilityGranger
62.9%37.1%
KO / TKO
31%
Submission
26%
Decision
42%
Expected fight time: 9.7 min
What drives the pick

Each bar is a feature's push on the model from the center axis. Red pushes toward Lemos, blue toward Granger. Tap a bar for why.

Predicted outcomes
Lemos63%
Wins by
Model
Equity
Mkt
KO / TKO24%38%
Submission14%22%
Decision25%40%
Predicted output
Sig. strikes33 (1843)act 8
Takedowns0.7 (0.02.5)act 1
Granger37%
Wins by
Model
Equity
Mkt
KO / TKO7%20%
Submission13%34%
Decision17%46%
Predicted output
Sig. strikes32 (1741)act 4
Takedowns0.3 (0.01.2)act 0
Combined totals~64 sig strikes~1.0 takedownsmkt —
How it ends
mkt —
R131%
R215%
R312%
Distance42%
Fighter props
Most sig. strikestie 1.7%
Lemos
50.5%-106
Granger
+10647.8%
Most takedownstie 39.1%
Lemos
44.7%-277
Granger
+27716.2%
Significant strikes — over/under
Lemos
Expected: 32.7
32.5
Over 32.5
42.9%
+133
Under 32.5
57.1%
-133
04182
Granger
Expected: 31.7
31.5
Over 31.5
43.0%
+133
Under 31.5
57.0%
-133
04080
Takedowns — over/under
Lemos
Expected: 0.7
0.5
Over 0.5
53.5%
-115
Under 0.5
46.5%
+115
035
Granger
Expected: 0.3
0.5
Over 0.5
26.9%
+272
Under 0.5
73.1%
-272
035

Odds are model-implied (no real prop market is priced for these). The “most” prices are draw-no-bet — a tie (for takedowns, usually 0–0) is a push, so each side is priced off its chance of winning given a result, while the % shown is the raw chance of landing strictly more. Drag a line in half-point steps: a half line (e.g. 2.5) is a clean over/under, while a whole number adds a third outcome — landing exactly on it, a push — so over, exact and under sum to 100%. On a whole number the over/under odds are draw-no-bet (priced off the decisive mass, since the push refunds), so the two sides stay mirror images rather than implying an arbitrage.

Expected fight time 9.7 min. Predicted-output ranges are percentiles of the model’s simulated fights: sig strikes the middle 50% (25th–75th); takedowns the wider 10th–90th, since they’re 0 in most fights so a narrow band would collapse to 0. Win-by-method = win probability × that fighter’s own method split: the model forecasts how the fight ends, and that forecast is divided between the corners by each fighter’s finishing record — UFC wins in full, earlier-career wins at half weight, as of fight night — reconciled so the fighters’ totals still equal their win probabilities and the methods still total the fight-level forecast above. “Equity” is each of those over that fighter’s win % — how they win given that they win — so a column adds to 100%, and it differs by corner. A fighter with no classifiable wins at any level leans on the fight-level split. “How it ends” is the model’s round-of-finish split. “Mkt” is the de-vigged market prop (consensus across books), shown for context, not as a betting signal; rounds & totals slots fill as that data lands. Percentages are apportioned by largest remainder, so each set adds to its total exactly and an individual figure can sit a point off its own rounding.

Model vs market
Final
ModelMarketGapLine
To win
Lemos62.9%28.5%+34.4+234
Granger37.1%71.5%−34.4-303

Market % is the de-vigged (no-vig) consensus across the books that price both fighters; the line is the average across books with the min–max range in parentheses. Gap is the model minus the market in points (+ = the model rates that outcome above the market). Thin or one-sided markets are flagged or left blank rather than shown as a fabricated %. Shown for context, not as a bet — the closing line is the sharpest public price and the model trails it on average. For 5-round bouts the model splits its round-3+ finish mass into rounds 3–5 by the historical within-bucket rate, so the over-3.5 / 4.5 lines carry a model estimate.

Trait web
68.2Striking68.1
Lemos +0.1
34.5Grappling0.0
Lemos +34.5
Str/minStr accStr defAbsorbedTD/15TD accTD defSubs
Hover a point to see the values
LemosGranger
Tale of the tape
Ratings (Elo)
1505
Pound-for-pound
1536
1522
Divisional
1520
1503
Striking offense
1498
1493
Striking defense
1503
1499
Grappling offense
1491
1499
Grappling defense
1507
Physical
32 yrs
Age
27 yrs
5'4"
Height
5'7"
65"
Reach
68"
Southpaw
Stance
Orthodox
Striking (UFC career)
8.63
Strikes landed / min
4.07
64%
Strike accuracy
43%
12.81
Strikes absorbed / min
3.67
47%
Strike defense
67%
Grappling (UFC career)
1.90
Takedowns / 15 min
0.00
100%
Takedown accuracy
Takedown defense
0.0
Sub attempts / 15 min
0.0
Form & résumé
0%
UFC win rate
100%
-1
Win/loss streak
+1
0%
Last-5 win rate
100%
Finish rate
0%
Recent opp. quality
888
Days since last fight
140
Recent form (last 5 UFC)
Amanda Lemos
  • LLeslie SmithKO/TKO R2
    Close +1852y 5mo before
Miranda Granger
  • WHannah GoldyU-DEC R3
    Close -1055mo before
Lemos — win / loss by method
Record: 6-1-1

Bar length is fight count (largest bar = full width); shading splits finishes by round and decisions by unanimous vs split — tap a bar for the round-by-round count.

KO/TKO
5 wins, 1 loss
W
83% of wins
L
100% of losses
Submission
1 win, 0 losses
W
17% of wins
L
0% of losses
Decision
0 wins, 0 losses
W
0% of wins
L
0% of losses
UFC
0win1loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
0 ()KO/TKO(100%) 1
0 ()Submission(0%) 0
0 ()Decision(0%) 0
Non-UFC
6win0loss1draw0NC
WinsLosses
5 (83%)KO/TKO() 0
1 (17%)Submission() 0
0 (0%)Decision() 0
Granger — win / loss by method
Record: 7-0-0

Bar length is fight count (largest bar = full width); shading splits finishes by round and decisions by unanimous vs split — tap a bar for the round-by-round count.

KO/TKO
1 win, 0 losses
W
14% of wins
L
Submission
5 wins, 0 losses
W
71% of wins
L
Decision
1 win, 0 losses
W
14% of wins
L
UFC
1win0loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
0 (0%)KO/TKO() 0
0 (0%)Submission() 0
1 (100%)Decision() 0
Non-UFC
6win0loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
1 (17%)KO/TKO() 0
5 (83%)Submission() 0
0 (0%)Decision() 0

Profiles

Experience
Lemos
Granger
1
UFC fights
1
7.9 min · 7.9 avg
Octagon time
15.0 min · 15.0 avg
12y 0m
Career length
8y 11m
UFC schedule strength

Opponents' records on fight night — toggle their full cross-promotional record vs UFC bouts only.

Lemos
Granger
9W–7L · 56.3%
Overall
5W–0L · 100.0%
0W–0L
Wins
5W–0L · 100.0%
9W–7L · 56.3%
Losses
0W–0L
Non-UFC schedule strength
Lemos
Granger
5W–4L · 55.6%
Overall
23W–14L · 62.2%
5W–4L · 55.6%
Wins
23W–14L · 62.2%
0W–0L
Losses
0W–0L
Distance striking
Lemos
Granger
13.33
Landed / min
4.10
60.4%
Accuracy
40.2%
60.0%
Defense
70.3%
0.00
Knockdowns / 15 min
0.00
52.3%
Time at distance
76.5%
Grappling & control
Lemos
Granger
1.90
Takedowns / 15 min
0.00
100.0%
Takedown accuracy
Takedown defense
0.00
Sub attempts / 15 min
0.00
27.3%
Control share
5.2%
Strike target map
Lemos
  • Head63%(43)div 61%
  • Body21%(14)div 22%
  • Legs16%(11)div 16%
Granger
  • Head51%(31)div 61%
  • Body13%(8)div 22%
  • Legs36%(22)div 16%

Where each fighter lands significant strikes (career). “div” = the weight-class average.

Amanda Lemos
CloseSSTDKDCtrl

Per-fight: SS & TD shown landed/attempted; Close = consensus closing line.

Miranda Granger
CloseSSTDKDCtrl

Per-fight: SS & TD shown landed/attempted; Close = consensus closing line.