The Ultimate Fight Fan
+ Log a bet
UFC Fight Night: Bonfim vs. Brown
Jamall Emmers
Jamall Emmers
21-8 · USA
VS
Hyder Amil
Hyder Amil
11-1 · USA
November 8, 2025 · Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Featherweight · 3 rounds
145.0lb
Weigh-in
145.5lb
Jamall Emmers def. Hyder Amil by U-DEC, R3 5:00
Performance
Round by round
SSTDKDCtrl
R1
Emmers28/652/200:25
Amil33/900/100:17
R2
Emmers13/233/403:20
Amil12/290/000:00
R3
Emmers9/132/204:50
Amil2/60/000:00
Total
Emmers50/1017/808:35
Amil47/1250/100:17

Scorecards

Emmers vs Amil

RdBen CartlidgeChris LeeSaleem HaniffCommunity
R110-910-99-109.4-9.6
R210-910-910-910-9
R310-910-910-810-8.6
Total30-2730-2729-2729.4-27.2

Media (9 cards) · avg 29.127.8 · 9 Emmers · 0 Amil

Official cards + public consensus via MMA Decisions. Per round: Emmers-Amil.

Pre-fight

The model's read going in

The walk-forward model's call at the time of the bout — persisted out-of-sample, with no hindsight about the result.

Prediction
EmmersWin probabilityAmil
54.9%45.1%
KO / TKO
34%
Submission
18%
Decision
48%
Expected fight time: 10.1 min
Retrospective pick: the walk-forward model's call at the time of the fight — persisted out-of-sample, with no hindsight about the result.
What drives the pick

Each bar is a feature's push on the model from the center axis. Red pushes toward Emmers, blue toward Amil. Tap a bar for why.

Predicted outcomes
Emmers55%
Wins by
Model
Equity
Mkt
KO / TKO18%32%
Submission10%18%
Decision27%50%
Predicted output
Sig. strikes46 (1962)act 50
Takedowns0.6 (0.02.5)act 7
Amil45%
Wins by
Model
Equity
Mkt
KO / TKO16%36%
Submission8%17%
Decision21%47%
Predicted output
Sig. strikes48 (2066)act 47
Takedowns0.6 (0.02.5)act 0
Combined totals~95 sig strikes~1.2 takedownsmkt —
How it ends
mkt —
R127%
R217%
R37%
Distance49%
Fighter props
Most sig. strikestie 1.0%
Emmers
47.6%+108
Amil
-10851.4%
Most takedownstie 42.1%
Emmers
28.8%+101
Amil
-10129.1%
Significant strikes — over/under
Emmers
Expected: 46.0
46
Over 46
39.3%
+152
Exactly 46
1.1%
push
Under 46
59.7%
-152
058116
Amil
Expected: 48.5
48.5
Over 48.5
39.7%
+152
Under 48.5
60.3%
-152
061122
Takedowns — over/under
Emmers
Expected: 0.6
0.5
Over 0.5
38.0%
+164
Under 0.5
62.1%
-164
035
Amil
Expected: 0.6
0.5
Over 0.5
38.2%
+162
Under 0.5
61.8%
-162
035

Odds are model-implied (no real prop market is priced for these). The “most” prices are draw-no-bet — a tie (for takedowns, usually 0–0) is a push, so each side is priced off its chance of winning given a result, while the % shown is the raw chance of landing strictly more. Drag a line in half-point steps: a half line (e.g. 2.5) is a clean over/under, while a whole number adds a third outcome — landing exactly on it, a push — so over, exact and under sum to 100%. On a whole number the over/under odds are draw-no-bet (priced off the decisive mass, since the push refunds), so the two sides stay mirror images rather than implying an arbitrage.

Expected fight time 10.1 min. Predicted-output ranges are percentiles of the model’s simulated fights: sig strikes the middle 50% (25th–75th); takedowns the wider 10th–90th, since they’re 0 in most fights so a narrow band would collapse to 0. Win-by-method = win probability × that fighter’s own method split: the model forecasts how the fight ends, and that forecast is divided between the corners by each fighter’s finishing record — UFC wins in full, earlier-career wins at half weight, as of fight night — reconciled so the fighters’ totals still equal their win probabilities and the methods still total the fight-level forecast above. “Equity” is each of those over that fighter’s win % — how they win given that they win — so a column adds to 100%, and it differs by corner. A fighter with no classifiable wins at any level leans on the fight-level split. “How it ends” is the model’s round-of-finish split. “Mkt” is the de-vigged market prop (consensus across books), shown for context, not as a betting signal; rounds & totals slots fill as that data lands. Percentages are apportioned by largest remainder, so each set adds to its total exactly and an individual figure can sit a point off its own rounding.

Model vs market
Final
ModelMarketGapLine
To win
Emmers54.9%42.9%+12.0+124
Amil45.1%57.1%−12.0-146

Market % is the de-vigged (no-vig) consensus across the books that price both fighters; the line is the average across books with the min–max range in parentheses. Gap is the model minus the market in points (+ = the model rates that outcome above the market). Thin or one-sided markets are flagged or left blank rather than shown as a fabricated %. Shown for context, not as a bet — the closing line is the sharpest public price and the model trails it on average. For 5-round bouts the model splits its round-3+ finish mass into rounds 3–5 by the historical within-bucket rate, so the over-3.5 / 4.5 lines carry a model estimate.

Trait web
72.0Striking69.2
Emmers +2.8
52.5Grappling56.2
Amil +3.7
Str/minStr accStr defAbsorbedTD/15TD accTD defSubs
Hover a point to see the values
EmmersAmil
Tale of the tape
Ratings (Elo)
1536
Pound-for-pound
1564
1537
Divisional
1565
1520
Striking offense
1520
1502
Striking defense
1497
1497
Grappling offense
1508
1510
Grappling defense
1497
Physical
36 yrs
Age
35 yrs
5'10"
Height
5'9"
74"
Reach
70"
Orthodox
Stance
Switch
Striking (UFC career)
5.20
Strikes landed / min
10.08
47%
Strike accuracy
58%
3.66
Strikes absorbed / min
5.90
59%
Strike defense
51%
Grappling (UFC career)
1.89
Takedowns / 15 min
1.26
41%
Takedown accuracy
20%
79%
Takedown defense
100%
0.2
Sub attempts / 15 min
1.3
Form & résumé
50%
UFC win rate
75%
+1
Win/loss streak
-1
60%
Last-5 win rate
75%
50%
Finish rate
67%
Recent opp. quality
224
Days since last fight
133
Recent form (last 5 UFC)
Jamall Emmers
  • WGabriel MirandaKO/TKO R1
    Close -4807mo before
  • LNate LandwehrKO/TKO R1
    Close -1991y 7mo before
  • WDennis BuzukjaKO/TKO R1
    Close -2522y before
  • LJack JenkinsS-DEC R3
    Close -2002y 5mo before
  • WKhusein AskhabovU-DEC R3
    Close +1442y 9mo before
Hyder Amil
  • LJose DelgadoKO/TKO R1
    Close +1094mo before
  • WWilliam GomisS-DEC R3
    Close +1798mo before
  • WJeongYeong LeeKO/TKO R1
    Close +1711y 4mo before
  • WFernie GarciaKO/TKO R2
    Close +1651y 9mo before
Emmers — win / loss by method
Record: 21-8-0

Bar length is fight count (largest bar = full width); shading splits finishes by round and decisions by unanimous vs split — tap a bar for the round-by-round count.

KO/TKO
9 wins, 3 losses
W
43% of wins
L
38% of losses
Submission
3 wins, 2 losses
W
14% of wins
L
25% of losses
Decision
9 wins, 3 losses
W
43% of wins
L
38% of losses
UFC
4win4loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
2 (50%)KO/TKO(25%) 1
0 (0%)Submission(25%) 1
2 (50%)Decision(50%) 2
Non-UFC
17win4loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
7 (41%)KO/TKO(50%) 2
3 (18%)Submission(25%) 1
7 (41%)Decision(25%) 1
Amil — win / loss by method
Record: 11-1-0

Bar length is fight count (largest bar = full width); shading splits finishes by round and decisions by unanimous vs split — tap a bar for the round-by-round count.

KO/TKO
6 wins, 1 loss
W
55% of wins
L
100% of losses
Submission
1 win, 0 losses
W
9% of wins
L
0% of losses
Decision
4 wins, 0 losses
W
36% of wins
L
0% of losses
UFC
3win1loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
2 (67%)KO/TKO(100%) 1
0 (0%)Submission(0%) 0
1 (33%)Decision(0%) 0
Non-UFC
8win0loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
4 (50%)KO/TKO() 0
1 (13%)Submission() 0
3 (38%)Decision() 0

Profiles

Experience
Emmers
Amil
8
UFC fights
4
71.5 min · 8.9 avg
Octagon time
23.7 min · 5.9 avg
13y 10m
Career length
8y 8m
UFC schedule strength

Opponents' records on fight night — toggle their full cross-promotional record vs UFC bouts only.

Emmers
Amil
108W–24L · 81.8%
Overall
42W–8L · 84.0%
58W–12L · 82.9%
Wins
33W–7L · 82.5%
50W–12L · 80.6%
Losses
9W–1L · 90.0%
Non-UFC schedule strength
Emmers
Amil
167W–79L · 67.9%
Overall
45W–21L · 68.2%
119W–57L · 67.6%
Wins
45W–21L · 68.2%
48W–22L · 68.6%
Losses
0W–0L
Distance striking
Emmers
Amil
6.52
Landed / min
13.61
43.4%
Accuracy
56.3%
61.6%
Defense
53.1%
0.63
Knockdowns / 15 min
0.63
64.5%
Time at distance
62.3%
Grappling & control
Emmers
Amil
1.89
Takedowns / 15 min
1.26
40.9%
Takedown accuracy
20.0%
78.6%
Takedown defense
100.0%
0.21
Sub attempts / 15 min
1.26
84.1%
Control share
67.8%
Strike target map
Emmers
  • Head54%(202)div 64%
  • Body31%(116)div 20%
  • Legs15%(54)div 16%
Amil
  • Head66%(157)div 64%
  • Body22%(53)div 20%
  • Legs12%(29)div 16%

Where each fighter lands significant strikes (career). “div” = the weight-class average.

Jamall Emmers
CloseSSTDKDCtrl

Per-fight: SS & TD shown landed/attempted; Close = consensus closing line.

Hyder Amil
CloseSSTDKDCtrl

Per-fight: SS & TD shown landed/attempted; Close = consensus closing line.