The Ultimate Fight Fan
+ Log a bet
UFC Fight Night: Dos Anjos vs. Fiziev
David Onama
David Onama
9-1 · USA
VS
July 9, 2022 · Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Featherweight · 3 rounds
145.5lb
Weigh-in
145.0lb
David Onama def. Garrett Armfield by SUB (Arm Triangle), R2 3:13
Performance
Round by round
SSTDKDCtrl
R1
Onama20/491/400:34
Armfield12/480/001:52
R2 · 3:13
Onama9/231/202:01
Armfield9/240/200:00
Total
Onama29/722/602:35
Armfield21/720/201:52

Pre-fight

The model's read going in

The walk-forward model's call at the time of the bout — persisted out-of-sample, with no hindsight about the result.

Prediction
OnamaWin probabilityArmfield
59.7%40.3%
KO / TKO
28%
Submission
23%
Decision
49%
Expected fight time: 10.0 min
Retrospective pick: the walk-forward model's call at the time of the fight — persisted out-of-sample, with no hindsight about the result.
What drives the pick

Each bar is a feature's push on the model from the center axis. Red pushes toward Onama, blue toward Armfield. Tap a bar for why.

Predicted outcomes
Onama60%
Wins by
Model
Equity
Mkt
KO / TKO18%30%42%
Submission15%24%16%
Decision27%46%26%
Predicted output
Sig. strikes46 (1962)act 29
Takedowns0.5 (0.02.2)act 2
Armfield40%
Wins by
Model
Equity
Mkt
KO / TKO10%26%6%
Submission9%21%3%
Decision21%53%7%
Predicted output
Sig. strikes43 (1858)act 21
Takedowns1.1 (0.03.6)act 0
Combined totals~89 sig strikes~1.6 takedownsmkt —
How it ends
mkt —
R130%
R213%
R38%
Distance49%
Fighter props
Most sig. strikestie 1.1%
Onama
51.1%-107
Armfield
+10747.8%
Most takedownstie 34.0%
Onama
19.4%+241
Armfield
-24146.6%
Significant strikes — over/under
Onama
Expected: 45.5
45.5
Over 45.5
39.8%
+151
Under 45.5
60.2%
-151
057114
Armfield
Expected: 43.0
43
Over 43
39.3%
+152
Exactly 43
1.1%
push
Under 43
59.6%
-152
054108
Takedowns — over/under
Onama
Expected: 0.5
0.5
Over 0.5
30.5%
+228
Under 0.5
69.5%
-228
035
Armfield
Expected: 1.1
1
Over 1
37.2%
+116
Exactly 1
19.8%
push
Under 1
43.0%
-116
035

Odds are model-implied (no real prop market is priced for these). The “most” prices are draw-no-bet — a tie (for takedowns, usually 0–0) is a push, so each side is priced off its chance of winning given a result, while the % shown is the raw chance of landing strictly more. Drag a line in half-point steps: a half line (e.g. 2.5) is a clean over/under, while a whole number adds a third outcome — landing exactly on it, a push — so over, exact and under sum to 100%. On a whole number the over/under odds are draw-no-bet (priced off the decisive mass, since the push refunds), so the two sides stay mirror images rather than implying an arbitrage.

Expected fight time 10.0 min. Predicted-output ranges are percentiles of the model’s simulated fights: sig strikes the middle 50% (25th–75th); takedowns the wider 10th–90th, since they’re 0 in most fights so a narrow band would collapse to 0. Win-by-method = win probability × that fighter’s own method split: the model forecasts how the fight ends, and that forecast is divided between the corners by each fighter’s finishing record — UFC wins in full, earlier-career wins at half weight, as of fight night — reconciled so the fighters’ totals still equal their win probabilities and the methods still total the fight-level forecast above. “Equity” is each of those over that fighter’s win % — how they win given that they win — so a column adds to 100%, and it differs by corner. A fighter with no classifiable wins at any level leans on the fight-level split. “How it ends” is the model’s round-of-finish split. “Mkt” is the de-vigged market prop (consensus across books), shown for context, not as a betting signal; rounds & totals slots fill as that data lands. Percentages are apportioned by largest remainder, so each set adds to its total exactly and an individual figure can sit a point off its own rounding.

Model vs market
Final
ModelMarketGapLine
To win
Onama59.7%85.2%−25.5-809
Armfield40.3%14.8%+25.5+549
By method
Onama by KO/TKO16.9%42.4%−25.5-111
Onama by submission13.8%15.6%−1.8+416
Onama by decision29.0%26.1%+2.9+208
Armfield by KO/TKO11.4%6.5%+4.9+1138
Armfield by submission9.3%2.9%+6.4+2716
Armfield by decision19.6%6.6%+13.0+1122
Total rounds (over)
Over 1.5 rds69.6%56.3%+13.3-150
Over 2.5 rds56.1%44.2%+11.9+110
Goes the distance
Fight goes to decision48.6%36.4%+12.2+158

Market % is the de-vigged (no-vig) consensus across the books that price both fighters; the line is the average across books with the min–max range in parentheses. Gap is the model minus the market in points (+ = the model rates that outcome above the market). Thin or one-sided markets are flagged or left blank rather than shown as a fabricated %. Shown for context, not as a bet — the closing line is the sharpest public price and the model trails it on average. For 5-round bouts the model splits its round-3+ finish mass into rounds 3–5 by the historical within-bucket rate, so the over-3.5 / 4.5 lines carry a model estimate.

Trait web
Str/minStr accStr defAbsorbedTD/15TD accTD defSubs
Hover a point to see the values
OnamaArmfield
Tale of the tape
Ratings (Elo)
1528
Pound-for-pound
1515
1543
Divisional
1515
1513
Striking offense
1500
1491
Striking defense
1500
1487
Grappling offense
1494
1498
Grappling defense
1500
Physical
28 yrs
Age
25 yrs
5'11"
Height
5'6"
74"
Reach
70"
Orthodox
Stance
Orthodox
Striking (UFC career)
6.49
Strikes landed / min
51%
Strike accuracy
6.86
Strikes absorbed / min
47%
Strike defense
Grappling (UFC career)
0.00
Takedowns / 15 min
0%
Takedown accuracy
43%
Takedown defense
0.0
Sub attempts / 15 min
Form & résumé
50%
UFC win rate
+1
Win/loss streak
50%
Last-5 win rate
100%
Finish rate
Recent opp. quality
140
Days since last fight
Recent form (last 5 UFC)
David Onama
  • WGabriel BenitezKO/TKO R1
    Close -1855mo before
  • LMason JonesU-DEC R3
    Close +3279mo before
Garrett Armfield
No prior UFC fights.
Onama — win / loss by method
Record: 9-1-0

Bar length is fight count (largest bar = full width); shading splits finishes by round and decisions by unanimous vs split — tap a bar for the round-by-round count.

KO/TKO
6 wins, 0 losses
W
67% of wins
L
0% of losses
Submission
3 wins, 0 losses
W
33% of wins
L
0% of losses
Decision
0 wins, 1 loss
W
0% of wins
L
100% of losses
UFC
1win1loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
1 (100%)KO/TKO(0%) 0
0 (0%)Submission(0%) 0
0 (0%)Decision(100%) 1
Non-UFC
8win0loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
5 (63%)KO/TKO() 0
3 (38%)Submission() 0
0 (0%)Decision() 0
Armfield — win / loss by method
Record: 8-2-0

Bar length is fight count (largest bar = full width); shading splits finishes by round and decisions by unanimous vs split — tap a bar for the round-by-round count.

KO/TKO
5 wins, 0 losses
W
63% of wins
L
0% of losses
Submission
2 wins, 1 loss
W
25% of wins
L
50% of losses
Decision
1 win, 1 loss
W
13% of wins
L
50% of losses
UFC
0win0loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
0 ()KO/TKO() 0
0 ()Submission() 0
0 ()Decision() 0
Non-UFC
8win2loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
5 (63%)KO/TKO(0%) 0
2 (25%)Submission(50%) 1
1 (13%)Decision(50%) 1

Profiles

Experience
Onama
Armfield
2
UFC fights
0
19.4 min · 9.7 avg
Octagon time
7y 5m
Career length
UFC schedule strength

Opponents' records on fight night — toggle their full cross-promotional record vs UFC bouts only.

Onama
Armfield
32W–10L · 76.2%
Overall
22W–9L · 71.0%
Wins
10W–1L · 90.9%
Losses
Non-UFC schedule strength
Onama
Armfield
31W–21L · 59.6%
Overall
42W–44L · 48.8%
31W–21L · 59.6%
Wins
34W–42L · 44.7%
0W–0L
Losses
8W–2L · 80.0%
Distance striking
Onama
Armfield
11.44
Landed / min
47.7%
Accuracy
49.3%
Defense
0.77
Knockdowns / 15 min
47.3%
Time at distance
Grappling & control
Onama
Armfield
0.00
Takedowns / 15 min
0.0%
Takedown accuracy
42.9%
Takedown defense
0.00
Sub attempts / 15 min
3.7%
Control share
Strike target map
Onama
  • Head87%(110)div 64%
  • Body8%(10)div 20%
  • Legs5%(6)div 16%
Armfield
  • Head0%(0)div 64%
  • Body0%(0)div 20%
  • Legs0%(0)div 16%
  • No strike data on record.

Where each fighter lands significant strikes (career). “div” = the weight-class average.

David Onama
CloseSSTDKDCtrl

Per-fight: SS & TD shown landed/attempted; Close = consensus closing line.

Garrett Armfield

No UFC fights on record.

Per-fight: SS & TD shown landed/attempted; Close = consensus closing line.