The Ultimate Fight Fan
+ Log a bet
UFC Fight Night: Vera vs. Cruz
Nate Landwehr
Nate Landwehr
15-4 · USA
VS
David Onama
David Onama
10-1 · USA
August 13, 2022 · San Diego, California, USA
Featherweight · 3 rounds
145.5lb
Weigh-in
145.0lb
Nate Landwehr def. David Onama by M-DEC, R3 5:00
Performance
Round by round
SSTDKDCtrl
R1
Landwehr21/520/000:31
Onama46/911/210:43
R2
Landwehr43/763/303:08
Onama8/210/200:20
R3
Landwehr27/570/101:26
Onama17/620/200:10
Total
Landwehr91/1853/405:05
Onama71/1741/611:13

Scorecards

Landwehr vs Onama

RdDerek ClearyJunichiro KamijoMichael BellCommunity
R19-109-109-108.8-10
R210-810-810-810-7.9
R310-910-99-109.8-9.2
Total29-2729-2728-2828.6-27.1

Media (14 cards) · avg 28.927.1 · 12 Landwehr · 0 Onama · 2 draws

Official cards + public consensus via MMA Decisions. Per round: Landwehr-Onama.

Pre-fight

The model's read going in

The walk-forward model's call at the time of the bout — persisted out-of-sample, with no hindsight about the result.

Prediction
LandwehrWin probabilityOnama
38.9%61.1%
KO / TKO
38%
Submission
18%
Decision
44%
Expected fight time: 9.4 min
Retrospective pick: the walk-forward model's call at the time of the fight — persisted out-of-sample, with no hindsight about the result.
What drives the pick

Each bar is a feature's push on the model from the center axis. Red pushes toward Landwehr, blue toward Onama. Tap a bar for why.

Predicted outcomes
Landwehr39%
Wins by
Model
Equity
Mkt
KO / TKO13%34%11%
Submission4%11%5%
Decision22%55%11%
Predicted output
Sig. strikes44 (1860)act 91
Takedowns0.7 (0.02.8)act 3
Onama61%
Wins by
Model
Equity
Mkt
KO / TKO25%41%38%
Submission14%23%14%
Decision22%36%21%
Predicted output
Sig. strikes52 (2271)act 71
Takedowns0.6 (0.02.3)act 1
Combined totals~96 sig strikes~1.3 takedownsmkt —
How it ends
mkt —
R134%
R215%
R37%
Distance44%
Fighter props
Most sig. strikestie 1.0%
Landwehr
43.8%+126
Onama
-12655.2%
Most takedownstie 41.3%
Landwehr
34.2%-139
Onama
+13924.6%
Significant strikes — over/under
Landwehr
Expected: 44.1
44
Over 44
39.4%
+151
Exactly 44
1.1%
push
Under 44
59.5%
-151
056111
Onama
Expected: 52.2
52
Over 52
39.5%
+151
Exactly 52
0.9%
push
Under 52
59.6%
-151
066131
Takedowns — over/under
Landwehr
Expected: 0.7
0.5
Over 0.5
43.2%
+131
Under 0.5
56.8%
-131
035
Onama
Expected: 0.6
0.5
Over 0.5
33.8%
+196
Under 0.5
66.2%
-196
035

Odds are model-implied (no real prop market is priced for these). The “most” prices are draw-no-bet — a tie (for takedowns, usually 0–0) is a push, so each side is priced off its chance of winning given a result, while the % shown is the raw chance of landing strictly more. Drag a line in half-point steps: a half line (e.g. 2.5) is a clean over/under, while a whole number adds a third outcome — landing exactly on it, a push — so over, exact and under sum to 100%. On a whole number the over/under odds are draw-no-bet (priced off the decisive mass, since the push refunds), so the two sides stay mirror images rather than implying an arbitrage.

Expected fight time 9.4 min. Predicted-output ranges are percentiles of the model’s simulated fights: sig strikes the middle 50% (25th–75th); takedowns the wider 10th–90th, since they’re 0 in most fights so a narrow band would collapse to 0. Win-by-method = win probability × that fighter’s own method split: the model forecasts how the fight ends, and that forecast is divided between the corners by each fighter’s finishing record — UFC wins in full, earlier-career wins at half weight, as of fight night — reconciled so the fighters’ totals still equal their win probabilities and the methods still total the fight-level forecast above. “Equity” is each of those over that fighter’s win % — how they win given that they win — so a column adds to 100%, and it differs by corner. A fighter with no classifiable wins at any level leans on the fight-level split. “How it ends” is the model’s round-of-finish split. “Mkt” is the de-vigged market prop (consensus across books), shown for context, not as a betting signal; rounds & totals slots fill as that data lands. Percentages are apportioned by largest remainder, so each set adds to its total exactly and an individual figure can sit a point off its own rounding.

Model vs market
Final
ModelMarketGapLine
To win
Landwehr38.9%25.6%+13.3+273
Onama61.1%74.4%−13.3-349
By method
Landwehr by KO/TKO14.7%10.9%+3.8+643
Landwehr by submission7.2%5.5%+1.7+1376
Landwehr by decision17.0%11.4%+5.6+609
Onama by KO/TKO23.2%37.5%−14.3+115
Onama by submission11.2%14.1%−2.9+472
Onama by decision26.7%20.6%+6.1+292
Total rounds (over)
Over 1.5 rds65.9%55.3%+10.6-144
Over 2.5 rds50.8%40.9%+9.9+128
Goes the distance
Fight goes to decision43.7%34.2%+9.5+174

Market % is the de-vigged (no-vig) consensus across the books that price both fighters; the line is the average across books with the min–max range in parentheses. Gap is the model minus the market in points (+ = the model rates that outcome above the market). Thin or one-sided markets are flagged or left blank rather than shown as a fabricated %. Shown for context, not as a bet — the closing line is the sharpest public price and the model trails it on average. For 5-round bouts the model splits its round-3+ finish mass into rounds 3–5 by the historical within-bucket rate, so the over-3.5 / 4.5 lines carry a model estimate.

Trait web
66.5Striking63.8
Landwehr +2.7
61.5Grappling36.2
Landwehr +25.3
Str/minStr accStr defAbsorbedTD/15TD accTD defSubs
Hover a point to see the values
LandwehrOnama
Tale of the tape
Ratings (Elo)
1537
Pound-for-pound
1543
1536
Divisional
1558
1504
Striking offense
1514
1483
Striking defense
1491
1502
Grappling offense
1494
1507
Grappling defense
1499
Physical
34 yrs
Age
28 yrs
5'9"
Height
5'11"
72"
Reach
74"
Orthodox
Stance
Orthodox
Striking (UFC career)
6.51
Strikes landed / min
5.61
52%
Strike accuracy
49%
5.96
Strikes absorbed / min
5.58
51%
Strike defense
53%
Grappling (UFC career)
0.48
Takedowns / 15 min
1.09
50%
Takedown accuracy
22%
88%
Takedown defense
50%
1.0
Sub attempts / 15 min
0.5
Form & résumé
50%
UFC win rate
67%
+1
Win/loss streak
+2
50%
Last-5 win rate
67%
50%
Finish rate
100%
Recent opp. quality
301
Days since last fight
35
Recent form (last 5 UFC)
Nate Landwehr
  • WLudovit KleinSUB R3
    Close +29010mo before
  • LJulian ErosaKO/TKO R1
    Close -1321y 6mo before
  • WDarren ElkinsU-DEC R3
    Close +1002y 3mo before
  • LHerbert BurnsKO/TKO R1
    Close -1202y 7mo before
David Onama
  • WGarrett ArmfieldSUB R2
    Close -80935d before
  • WGabriel BenitezKO/TKO R1
    Close -1856mo before
  • LMason JonesU-DEC R3
    Close +32710mo before
Landwehr — win / loss by method
Record: 15-4-0

Bar length is fight count (largest bar = full width); shading splits finishes by round and decisions by unanimous vs split — tap a bar for the round-by-round count.

KO/TKO
8 wins, 2 losses
W
53% of wins
L
50% of losses
Submission
1 win, 1 loss
W
7% of wins
L
25% of losses
Decision
6 wins, 1 loss
W
40% of wins
L
25% of losses
UFC
2win2loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
0 (0%)KO/TKO(100%) 2
1 (50%)Submission(0%) 0
1 (50%)Decision(0%) 0
Non-UFC
13win2loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
8 (62%)KO/TKO(0%) 0
0 (0%)Submission(50%) 1
5 (38%)Decision(50%) 1
Onama — win / loss by method
Record: 10-1-0

Bar length is fight count (largest bar = full width); shading splits finishes by round and decisions by unanimous vs split — tap a bar for the round-by-round count.

KO/TKO
6 wins, 0 losses
W
60% of wins
L
0% of losses
Submission
4 wins, 0 losses
W
40% of wins
L
0% of losses
Decision
0 wins, 1 loss
W
0% of wins
L
100% of losses
UFC
2win1loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
1 (50%)KO/TKO(0%) 0
1 (50%)Submission(0%) 0
0 (0%)Decision(100%) 1
Non-UFC
8win0loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
5 (63%)KO/TKO() 0
3 (38%)Submission() 0
0 (0%)Decision() 0

Profiles

Experience
Landwehr
Onama
4
UFC fights
3
31.0 min · 7.8 avg
Octagon time
27.6 min · 9.2 avg
14y 1m
Career length
7y 5m
UFC schedule strength

Opponents' records on fight night — toggle their full cross-promotional record vs UFC bouts only.

Landwehr
Onama
74W–21L · 77.9%
Overall
40W–12L · 76.9%
41W–11L · 78.8%
Wins
30W–11L · 73.2%
33W–10L · 76.7%
Losses
10W–1L · 90.9%
Non-UFC schedule strength
Landwehr
Onama
150W–59L · 71.8%
Overall
31W–21L · 59.6%
136W–54L · 71.6%
Wins
31W–21L · 59.6%
14W–5L · 73.7%
Losses
0W–0L
Distance striking
Landwehr
Onama
7.66
Landed / min
10.35
47.2%
Accuracy
46.2%
52.6%
Defense
54.3%
0.00
Knockdowns / 15 min
0.54
63.1%
Time at distance
46.2%
Grappling & control
Landwehr
Onama
0.48
Takedowns / 15 min
1.09
50.0%
Takedown accuracy
22.2%
87.5%
Takedown defense
50.0%
0.97
Sub attempts / 15 min
0.54
57.7%
Control share
21.2%
Strike target map
Landwehr
  • Head72%(145)div 64%
  • Body14%(28)div 20%
  • Legs14%(29)div 16%
Onama
  • Head81%(126)div 64%
  • Body15%(23)div 20%
  • Legs4%(6)div 16%

Where each fighter lands significant strikes (career). “div” = the weight-class average.

Nate Landwehr
CloseSSTDKDCtrl

Per-fight: SS & TD shown landed/attempted; Close = consensus closing line.

David Onama
CloseSSTDKDCtrl

Per-fight: SS & TD shown landed/attempted; Close = consensus closing line.