The Ultimate Fight Fan
+ Log a bet
UFC Fight Night: Kattar vs. Allen
VS
Joshua Weems
Joshua Weems
11-2 · USA
October 29, 2022 · Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Bantamweight · 3 rounds
136.0lb
Weigh-in
139.5lbMissed +3.5
Christian Rodriguez def. Joshua Weems by SUB (Anaconda Choke), R1 4:07
Performance
Round by round
SSTDKDCtrl
R1 · 4:07
Rodriguez9/230/200:56
Weems18/262/301:03
Total
Rodriguez9/230/200:56
Weems18/262/301:03

Pre-fight

The model's read going in

The walk-forward model's call at the time of the bout — persisted out-of-sample, with no hindsight about the result.

Prediction
RodriguezWin probabilityWeems
57.9%42.1%
KO / TKO
29%
Submission
28%
Decision
42%
Expected fight time: 10.1 min
Retrospective pick: the walk-forward model's call at the time of the fight — persisted out-of-sample, with no hindsight about the result.
What drives the pick

Each bar is a feature's push on the model from the center axis. Red pushes toward Rodriguez, blue toward Weems. Tap a bar for why.

Predicted outcomes
Rodriguez58%
Wins by
Model
Equity
Mkt
KO / TKO20%34%36%
Submission14%24%11%
Decision24%42%29%
Predicted output
Sig. strikes35 (1448)act 9
Takedowns1.0 (0.03.4)act 0
Weems42%
Wins by
Model
Equity
Mkt
KO / TKO9%23%5%
Submission15%35%10%
Decision18%42%8%
Predicted output
Sig. strikes33 (1344)act 18
Takedowns1.2 (0.03.9)act 2
Combined totals~68 sig strikes~2.2 takedownsmkt —
How it ends
mkt —
R125%
R220%
R313%
Distance42%
Fighter props
Most sig. strikestie 1.4%
Rodriguez
51.7%-110
Weems
+11046.9%
Most takedownstie 27.1%
Rodriguez
30.5%+139
Weems
-13942.4%
Significant strikes — over/under
Rodriguez
Expected: 35.2
35
Over 35
39.4%
+150
Exactly 35
1.4%
push
Under 35
59.2%
-150
04589
Weems
Expected: 32.5
32.5
Over 32.5
39.8%
+151
Under 32.5
60.2%
-151
04182
Takedowns — over/under
Rodriguez
Expected: 1.0
1
Over 1
31.9%
+162
Exactly 1
16.4%
push
Under 1
51.7%
-162
035
Weems
Expected: 1.2
1
Over 1
40.1%
+100
Exactly 1
19.7%
push
Under 1
40.2%
-100
035

Odds are model-implied (no real prop market is priced for these). The “most” prices are draw-no-bet — a tie (for takedowns, usually 0–0) is a push, so each side is priced off its chance of winning given a result, while the % shown is the raw chance of landing strictly more. Drag a line in half-point steps: a half line (e.g. 2.5) is a clean over/under, while a whole number adds a third outcome — landing exactly on it, a push — so over, exact and under sum to 100%. On a whole number the over/under odds are draw-no-bet (priced off the decisive mass, since the push refunds), so the two sides stay mirror images rather than implying an arbitrage.

Expected fight time 10.1 min. Predicted-output ranges are percentiles of the model’s simulated fights: sig strikes the middle 50% (25th–75th); takedowns the wider 10th–90th, since they’re 0 in most fights so a narrow band would collapse to 0. Win-by-method = win probability × that fighter’s own method split: the model forecasts how the fight ends, and that forecast is divided between the corners by each fighter’s finishing record — UFC wins in full, earlier-career wins at half weight, as of fight night — reconciled so the fighters’ totals still equal their win probabilities and the methods still total the fight-level forecast above. “Equity” is each of those over that fighter’s win % — how they win given that they win — so a column adds to 100%, and it differs by corner. A fighter with no classifiable wins at any level leans on the fight-level split. “How it ends” is the model’s round-of-finish split. “Mkt” is the de-vigged market prop (consensus across books), shown for context, not as a betting signal; rounds & totals slots fill as that data lands. Percentages are apportioned by largest remainder, so each set adds to its total exactly and an individual figure can sit a point off its own rounding.

Model vs market
Final
ModelMarketGapLine
To win
Rodriguez57.9%77.0%−19.1-412
Weems42.1%23.0%+19.1+317
By method
Rodriguez by KO/TKO17.0%35.7%−18.7+132
Rodriguez by submission16.5%11.4%+5.1+627
Rodriguez by decision24.4%28.8%−4.4+187
Weems by KO/TKO12.3%5.4%+6.9+1438
Weems by submission12.0%10.2%+1.8+710
Weems by decision17.8%8.5%+9.3+875
Total rounds (over)
Over 1.5 rds75.6%59.8%+15.8-176
Over 2.5 rds55.6%44.7%+10.9+110
Goes the distance
Fight goes to decision42.2%39.7%+2.5+136

Market % is the de-vigged (no-vig) consensus across the books that price both fighters; the line is the average across books with the min–max range in parentheses. Gap is the model minus the market in points (+ = the model rates that outcome above the market). Thin or one-sided markets are flagged or left blank rather than shown as a fabricated %. Shown for context, not as a bet — the closing line is the sharpest public price and the model trails it on average. For 5-round bouts the model splits its round-3+ finish mass into rounds 3–5 by the historical within-bucket rate, so the over-3.5 / 4.5 lines carry a model estimate.

Trait web
Str/minStr accStr defAbsorbedTD/15TD accTD defSubs
Hover a point to see the values
RodriguezWeems
Tale of the tape
Ratings (Elo)
1512
Pound-for-pound
1526
1528
Divisional
1526
1503
Striking offense
1500
1502
Striking defense
1500
1502
Grappling offense
1500
1495
Grappling defense
1500
Physical
24 yrs
Age
28 yrs
5'7"
Height
5'8"
71"
Reach
69"
Orthodox
Stance
Orthodox
Striking (UFC career)
1.73
Strikes landed / min
43%
Strike accuracy
1.20
Strikes absorbed / min
59%
Strike defense
Grappling (UFC career)
2.00
Takedowns / 15 min
100%
Takedown accuracy
40%
Takedown defense
3.0
Sub attempts / 15 min
Form & résumé
0%
UFC win rate
-1
Win/loss streak
0%
Last-5 win rate
Finish rate
Recent opp. quality
252
Days since last fight
Recent form (last 5 UFC)
Christian Rodriguez
  • LJonathan PearceU-DEC R3
    Close +2938mo before
Joshua Weems
No prior UFC fights.
Rodriguez — win / loss by method
Record: 7-1-0

Bar length is fight count (largest bar = full width); shading splits finishes by round and decisions by unanimous vs split — tap a bar for the round-by-round count.

KO/TKO
3 wins, 0 losses
W
43% of wins
L
0% of losses
Submission
3 wins, 0 losses
W
43% of wins
L
0% of losses
Decision
1 win, 1 loss
W
14% of wins
L
100% of losses
UFC
0win1loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
0 ()KO/TKO(0%) 0
0 ()Submission(0%) 0
0 ()Decision(100%) 1
Non-UFC
7win0loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
3 (43%)KO/TKO() 0
3 (43%)Submission() 0
1 (14%)Decision() 0
Weems — win / loss by method
Record: 11-2-0

Bar length is fight count (largest bar = full width); shading splits finishes by round and decisions by unanimous vs split — tap a bar for the round-by-round count.

KO/TKO
1 win, 2 losses
W
9% of wins
L
100% of losses
Submission
8 wins, 0 losses
W
73% of wins
L
0% of losses
Decision
2 wins, 0 losses
W
18% of wins
L
0% of losses
UFC
0win0loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
0 ()KO/TKO() 0
0 ()Submission() 0
0 ()Decision() 0
Non-UFC
11win2loss0draw0NC
WinsLosses
1 (9%)KO/TKO(100%) 2
8 (73%)Submission(0%) 0
2 (18%)Decision(0%) 0

Profiles

Experience
Rodriguez
Weems
1
UFC fights
0
15.0 min · 15.0 avg
Octagon time
7y 3m
Career length
UFC schedule strength

Opponents' records on fight night — toggle their full cross-promotional record vs UFC bouts only.

Rodriguez
Weems
11W–4L · 73.3%
Overall
0W–0L
Wins
11W–4L · 73.3%
Losses
Non-UFC schedule strength
Rodriguez
Weems
33W–48L · 40.7%
Overall
40W–31L · 56.3%
33W–48L · 40.7%
Wins
30W–30L · 50.0%
0W–0L
Losses
10W–1L · 90.9%
Distance striking
Rodriguez
Weems
9.64
Landed / min
41.8%
Accuracy
69.7%
Defense
0.00
Knockdowns / 15 min
15.9%
Time at distance
Grappling & control
Rodriguez
Weems
2.00
Takedowns / 15 min
100.0%
Takedown accuracy
40.0%
Takedown defense
3.00
Sub attempts / 15 min
8.8%
Control share
Strike target map
Rodriguez
  • Head81%(21)div 62%
  • Body19%(5)div 21%
  • Legs0%(0)div 17%
Weems
  • Head0%(0)div 62%
  • Body0%(0)div 21%
  • Legs0%(0)div 17%
  • No strike data on record.

Where each fighter lands significant strikes (career). “div” = the weight-class average.

Christian Rodriguez
CloseSSTDKDCtrl

Per-fight: SS & TD shown landed/attempted; Close = consensus closing line.

Joshua Weems

No UFC fights on record.

Per-fight: SS & TD shown landed/attempted; Close = consensus closing line.